Kommunikation in Verteilten Systemen (KiVS)
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-27301-8_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of WS-BusinessActivity and BPEL4WS Long-Running Transaction

Abstract: Although WS-BusinessActivity and BPEL4WS Long-Running Transaction (LRT) are conceptually very similar and are both designed to support the execution of complex business transactions, they differ in a large number of aspects. This is particularly true because BPEL4WS, unlike WS-BusinessActivity, was not designed to support distributed coordination. This paper comprehensively discusses the similarities and differences between WS-BusinessActivity and BPEL4WS LRT and demonstrates the two concepts on the basis of a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of the coordination framework should not be restricted to transaction processing systems; a wide variety of protocols should be defined for distributed applications. As show in Figure 1, we will extend the work of Sauter and Melzer [4] and add ESB as mid-layer that defines the additional interface to bridge these protocols. So we can integrate various heterogeneous service with transaction supported into BPEL in SOA environment.…”
Section: Motivation Of This Paper and The Designmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of the coordination framework should not be restricted to transaction processing systems; a wide variety of protocols should be defined for distributed applications. As show in Figure 1, we will extend the work of Sauter and Melzer [4] and add ESB as mid-layer that defines the additional interface to bridge these protocols. So we can integrate various heterogeneous service with transaction supported into BPEL in SOA environment.…”
Section: Motivation Of This Paper and The Designmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The work by Sauter and Melzer [4] focuses on a comparison of WS-Business Activity and BPEL with respect to long-running transactions. They show the differences as well as the similarities between these standards and discuss that they are not contradicting approaches as sometimes argued.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, before achieving an orchestration, the parties involved should already have agreed to participate in the interaction. For more details about how BPEL relates to other protocols we refer the reader to [Sauter and Melzer 2005;Kopp et al 2009] and to [Van Der Aalst et al 2003;van den Heuvel 2008] for surveys about business process specification.…”
Section: Applications Of Compensationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other research involving the standards discussed in this thesis includes [13], who compare WS-BA with the long-running transactions support of Business Process Execution Language (WS-BPEL) and propose a modified compensation concept in WS-BPEL, deprecating WS-BA altogether-unlike this paper, which is focused on the applicability of already existing WS-BA implementations in relevant scenarios, not necessarily their deprecation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%