2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2004.06.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of wild-caught wood mice and bank voles in the Intellicage: assessing exploration, daily activity patterns and place learning paradigms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
115
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
115
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies also showed that measures of learning can be collected in standardized automated home-cage environments without human interference (Galsworthy et al 2005;Mechan et al 2009;Gallistel et al 2010;Endo et al 2011;Balci et al 2013;Puścian et al 2014;Remmelink et al 2015); however, all these tasks restricted reinforcement schedules to specific times of the day. We here demonstrate that continuous testing is compatible with operant testing which allowed for the short duration of the reversal learning protocol as well as animal paced task participation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies also showed that measures of learning can be collected in standardized automated home-cage environments without human interference (Galsworthy et al 2005;Mechan et al 2009;Gallistel et al 2010;Endo et al 2011;Balci et al 2013;Puścian et al 2014;Remmelink et al 2015); however, all these tasks restricted reinforcement schedules to specific times of the day. We here demonstrate that continuous testing is compatible with operant testing which allowed for the short duration of the reversal learning protocol as well as animal paced task participation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Arndt et al (2009) reported that neither male nor female mice that were housed individually showed stronger signs of stress than their socially housed counterparts. Whether or not individual housing contributed to distress, individual housing during our test precluded an effect of hierarchy on task performance and/or competition for food and water reward as may be the case for home-cage settings using social housing (e.g., IntelliCages; Galsworthy et al 2005;Mechan et al 2009;Endo et al 2011). Additionally, individual housing allows for a voluntary drug administration procedure as described previously .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IntelliCage is a novel and automated method for assessing spontaneous behavior and place learning in a home cage environment with social interaction (Galsworthy et al, 2005). P14 mice were randomized to isoflurane (n = 16) or control (n = 15) and isoflurane anesthesia was performed as described above.…”
Section: Intellicage Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, D2 KO mice and WT controls were tested in a newly developed automated learning apparatus, IntelliCage system (Galsworthy et al 2005;Knapska et al 2006; www.newbehavior. com), a group-housing cage that is also a recording and testing apparatus, automatically gathering data of an individual mouse's visits to four corners and eight bottles (two bottles per corner).…”
Section: D2 Ko Mice Show Learning In Intellicagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mice were tested in a novel automated learning apparatus, an IntelliCage system, from NewBehavior AG (Galsworthy et al 2005;Knapska et al 2006). A week before the experiment the mice were exposed to isoflurane anesthesia and injected with a glasscovered microtransponder (11.5 mm length, 2.2 mm diameter; Trovan, ID-100) with a unique code.…”
Section: Intellicagesmentioning
confidence: 99%