2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpc.2003.10.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of weight average and direct boundary fitting of sedimentation velocity data for indefinite polymerizing systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, direct boundary fitting methods for interacting systems have been implemented in SEDANAL, SEDPHAT and ULTRASCAN. When compared, this approach gives comparable results to those obtained using weight-average analysis (Sontag et al, 2004). Some recent examples of direct boundary analysis to define the energetics of associating systems can be found in (Connaghan-Jones et al, 2006;Correia et al, 2005;Gelinas et al, 2004;Snyder et al, 2004).…”
Section: B Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More recently, direct boundary fitting methods for interacting systems have been implemented in SEDANAL, SEDPHAT and ULTRASCAN. When compared, this approach gives comparable results to those obtained using weight-average analysis (Sontag et al, 2004). Some recent examples of direct boundary analysis to define the energetics of associating systems can be found in (Connaghan-Jones et al, 2006;Correia et al, 2005;Gelinas et al, 2004;Snyder et al, 2004).…”
Section: B Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 66%
“…An advantage of this method is that the weight average sedimentation coefficient is a thermodynamically valid parameter that is determined the sample composition in the plateau and is independent of the kinetics of the interactions, provided that the sample is at equilibrium prior to sedimentation. Examples of this approach can be found in studies of CMV protease dimerization (Cole, 1996) and the complex association reactions of tubulin (Correia, 2000;Sontag et al, 2004) and HIV rev (Surendran et al, 2004). Interacting systems can also be characterized calculation of g(s*) distributions using the time-derivative method (Stafford, 2000).…”
Section: B Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tubulin undergoes Mg 2þ -and nucleotide-dependent oligomerization under conditions that do not favor microtubule assembly (27). This serves as a baseline reaction for proper interpretation of all other association reactions that might occur in a drug-dependent manner.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All experiments were initially analyzed with DCDT þ2 to produce g(s) distributions and weight-average S values (Ŝ w ) (29). Quantitative analysis ofŜ w data (26) or boundary shape (31) involves fitting to a model for indefinite polymerization (either tubulin alone or ligand-mediated polymer growth) where K iso is the propagation constant for polymer growth in the presence or absence of drug (V for vinca alkaloid; see refs (26)(27)(28) for details).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Table 1 it is apparent that the sedimentation velocity data for SEPT11C is more compatible with a monomer at lower concentrations and a dimer at higher concentrations. In our analysis we therefore assumed a dynamic equilibrium between these two states in solution with all changes in s 20,w being due to the monomer/dimer ratio (24)(25)(26)(27). The K Dapp of 7.2 5 0.8 mM for the SEPT11C homodimer was determined by fitting the data to the Boltzmann equation (Fig.…”
Section: Analytical Ultracentrifugationmentioning
confidence: 99%