2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11682-009-9075-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Voxel-Based Morphometry and Volumetry Methods in the Context of the Neural Basis of Aggression

Abstract: The assumption that voxel-based morphometry (VBM) offers an automated substitution for manually-traced volumetry was subjected to empirical evaluation. Data available from a previous volumetry study (Gansler et al. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging 171:145–154, 2009) provided the basis for the current study, which assessed for convergence between the methods. Optimized modulated VBM was used to preprocess images (N  = 40). Gray matter volume and self-reported aggression associations were tested. Results indica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However in recent years, iterative normalization and optimized segmentation procedures and algorithms have been developed to improve the final tissue classification (Ashburner and Friston, 2005). Emerton et al (2009) showed convergence in the VBM method in comparison with tracing-based volumetry methods; however they advocated the two methods to be considered complementary rather than interchangeable methods, due to different statistical approaches. Furthermore the same authors suggested that convergence depends on various factors such as inter-subject anatomical variability of the region of interest and/or the VBM preprocessing protocol employed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However in recent years, iterative normalization and optimized segmentation procedures and algorithms have been developed to improve the final tissue classification (Ashburner and Friston, 2005). Emerton et al (2009) showed convergence in the VBM method in comparison with tracing-based volumetry methods; however they advocated the two methods to be considered complementary rather than interchangeable methods, due to different statistical approaches. Furthermore the same authors suggested that convergence depends on various factors such as inter-subject anatomical variability of the region of interest and/or the VBM preprocessing protocol employed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The apparent inconsistency between these two methodologies can probably explained by the differing sensitivities of the two image analysis techniques. Volumetric approaches have greater sensitivity for the detection of diffuse change whereas automated voxel-based approaches are more likely to detect localized effects (Giuliani et al 2005; Emerton et al 2009). When this is considered, it is not entirely surprising that findings from the two approaches do not exactly tally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies [ 9 , 10 ] give detailed insights on comparisons between voxel based and volumetric studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%