2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.05.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of vital registration and reproductive‐age mortality survey in Bukidnon, Philippines, 2008

Abstract: Official reports led people using the data to believe that the MMR in the province was on track for Millennium Development Goal 5 (to reduce MMR by three-quarters by 2015). The present survey showed that local civil registries missed three-quarters of all maternal deaths. All countries engaged in addressing maternal mortality reduction should consider similar approaches to improve data quality.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This misclassification has been estimated, and a correction factor from 0.85 to 5.0 with a median value of 1.5, is routinely added to maternal deaths identified [ 1 , 23 ]. The proportion of underreporting of PRDs in our study was quite similar to that in the study conducted in Jamaica (76%) and the Philippines (75%) [ 24 , 25 ]. Late maternal deaths represented 11.4% of all deaths occurring during pregnancy within one year of pregnancy, while the MDSS identified none.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This misclassification has been estimated, and a correction factor from 0.85 to 5.0 with a median value of 1.5, is routinely added to maternal deaths identified [ 1 , 23 ]. The proportion of underreporting of PRDs in our study was quite similar to that in the study conducted in Jamaica (76%) and the Philippines (75%) [ 24 , 25 ]. Late maternal deaths represented 11.4% of all deaths occurring during pregnancy within one year of pregnancy, while the MDSS identified none.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Six studies used reproductive-age mortality surveys (RAMOS) 26,27,38,45,53,59 and eleven studies used routine data from multiple sources such as local registries, hospital-based records, data of management information systems and/or by conducting interviews with health attendants. 29,30,44,46,49,51,52,54,55,58,60 Eight confidential enquiries into maternal deaths enumerated deaths from facility-based records.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28–30,3943,45,4750,53,54,59,60 Nine of these used a consensus panel consisting of medical staff or health researchers to agree on the cause of death 28–30,39,42,45,48,49,60 , while six did not specify whether a consensus panel was used or not. 41,47,50,53,54,59 Two VA studies interpreted data using Inter VA-models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of the importance of health indicators based on mortality measures in the context of public health, the evaluation of mortality information systems has been the subject of studies worldwide [2][3][4] , especially with regard to the coverage of the systems and data quality. Information on the underlying cause of death is particularly relevant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%