2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.02355.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of urinary nuclear matrix protein‐22 and bladder tumour antigen tests with voided urinary cytology in detecting and following bladder cancer:the prognostic value of false‐positive results

Abstract: Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value of the nuclear matrix protein-22 (NMP22) and bladder tumour antigen (BTAstat) tests compared with voided urinary cytology (VUC) in detecting and following bladder cancer, assessing particularly the prognostic value of false-positive test results in patients followed up for bladder cancer. Patients and methods From 739 patients suspected of having bladder cancer, voided urine samples for the NMP22 and BTAstat tests, and for VUC and urine analysis, were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
62
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the published data over the last years, it becomes obvious that cytology, but also all other urine bound marker systems, were tested in order to replace cystoscopy for bladder cancer detection. As far as urinary cytology is concerned, this diagnostic indication has to be re-evaluated [7][8][9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the published data over the last years, it becomes obvious that cytology, but also all other urine bound marker systems, were tested in order to replace cystoscopy for bladder cancer detection. As far as urinary cytology is concerned, this diagnostic indication has to be re-evaluated [7][8][9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poulakis et al [29] evaluated 739 patients using NMP22 (cutoff ≥8.25 U/ml) and found sensitivities of 79% (165/208), 90% (83/92), and 97% (96/99) in patients with 1, 2-3, and >3 tumors, respectively. On the other hand, Sánchez-Carbayo et al [30] evaluated 187 patients using NMP22 (cutoff ≥14.6 U/ml) and found sensitivities of 72% (18/25) and 75% (61/81) in patients with single and multiple tumors, respectively.…”
Section: Urine-based Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BTA stat is a qualitative test, while BTA TRAK is quantitative. Both have been performed on fresh, refrigerated, or frozen urine obtained as voided or catheterized specimens [29,31,33,37,43,46,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61]. …”
Section: Urine-based Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poulakis et al [39] studied NMP22 ® , BTA stat tests and VUC in a total of 739 patients suspected of having bladder cancer. All patients underwent transurethral resection of bladder lesions or mapping, and were followed for a mean (range) of 27.3 (3-65) months.…”
Section: Comparative Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%