2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jveb.2013.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of uniaxial and triaxial accelerometers for the assessment of physical activity in dogs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike a triaxial accelerometer, a uniaxial accelerometer could only detect vibration in one direction. However, triaxial accelerometers are more expensive than uniaxial accelerometers, but their memory capacity is greater [27]. Due to its dependability, simplicity, and resilience, an accelerometer is an extensively used sensor.…”
Section: Sensormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike a triaxial accelerometer, a uniaxial accelerometer could only detect vibration in one direction. However, triaxial accelerometers are more expensive than uniaxial accelerometers, but their memory capacity is greater [27]. Due to its dependability, simplicity, and resilience, an accelerometer is an extensively used sensor.…”
Section: Sensormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vibration sensors are often permanently fixed at a particular location in the machine to allow for continuous or online monitoring of the machine's status. The sensor is fastened to the machine by being fitted into a stud [11][12][13]. In comparison to other mounting techniques, this one not only has the largest frequency response but is also extremely trustworthy and safe.…”
Section: Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decade, researchers have started to experiment with their suitability for animal populations, including domestic dogs ( Canis familiaris ). Particular focus has been given to measuring Physical Activity as a proxy for dysfunction or disease [ 6 10 ]. Research grade devices such as such as the Actical (Philips Respironics, Netherlands) and GT3X (Actigraph Inc., USA) (used in [ 11 , 12 ] respectively) are attractive as they have software that facilitates data export in formats suitable for post-processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%