2011
DOI: 10.4055/cios.2011.3.3.184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy Alone Versus Combined Arthroscopic Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Debridement and Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy for Ulnar Impaction Syndrome

Abstract: BackgroundThis study compared the results of patients treated for ulnar impaction syndrome using an ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) alone with those treated with combined arthroscopic debridement and USO.MethodsThe results of 27 wrists were reviewed retrospectively. They were divided into three groups: group A (USO alone, 10 cases), group B (combined arthroscopic debridement and USO, 9 cases), and group C (arthroscopic triangular fibrocartilage complex [TFCC] debridement alone, 8 cases). The wrist function wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
12
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors reported good clinical results after ulnar shortening osteotomy for TFCC tears with a positive ulnar variance [6,14,17]. We found no relationships between the Mayo Wrist Score and TFC thickness or the TFC angle on MR images; however, all our patients had excellent or good outcomes based on the Mayo Wrist Score.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 40%
“…Some authors reported good clinical results after ulnar shortening osteotomy for TFCC tears with a positive ulnar variance [6,14,17]. We found no relationships between the Mayo Wrist Score and TFC thickness or the TFC angle on MR images; however, all our patients had excellent or good outcomes based on the Mayo Wrist Score.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 40%
“…Arthroscopy at the time of ulnar shortening has been shown to have no additional benefit over shortening alone. 49 Results of ulnar shortening osteotomy are generally good. Baek et al 50 Poor outcomes were associated with degenerative changes at the DRUJ, long duration of symptoms, and workers' compensation claims.…”
Section: Ulnocarpal Impaction Syndromementioning
confidence: 97%
“…UPV shorter than 2 mm), and also noted that wrist arthroscopy is associated with a complication rate of 6 % respectively [49,50]. Likewise, recent evidence suggests that ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) accompanied with wrist arthroscopy does not always lead to satisfactory outcomes in patients with long duration of symptoms, and it does not confer any additional benefit over USO alone as well [40,[51][52][53]. Furthermore, evident UPV is considered to be contraindication for arthroscopy of the DRUJ [54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…should be positioned dorsoulnar ( Figure 5) that safely prevents soft tissue complications and painful impingement with the IOM potentially leading to loss of forearm rotation [51][52][53][69][70][71][72][73]. However, despite of correct performing USO accompanied with a correctly positioned plate, patient's disability is reported to be up to 19% after surgery, and so the postoperative course remains not always predictable [53,74].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%