Abstract:Objective:
Most dental chairs lack sufficient stability to perform effective manual chest compression (MCC) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). A stabilizing stool can significantly reduce backrest vertical displacement in all chair types; however, a severely curved exterior backrest may negatively impact the stool's effectiveness. This study evaluated the efficacy of 2 stool positions for stabilizing a dental chair during MCC.
Methods… Show more
“…The super cial edge of the stool's seat was set to vertically contact the backrest under the shoulders. 14,17 A cloth covered the side of the dental chair backrest so that participants could not see whether a stool is in place (with) or not (without).…”
Section: Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12] We previously reported on a method to reduce the vertical displacement of the dental chair during chest compressions. 13,14 This method stabilizes the dental chair by placing a stool under the backrest of the dental chair, reclining the dental chair, and bringing the stool into contact with the backrest. This method is recommended in the 2015 and 2021 European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines.…”
Background
To evaluate, how the influence of different with and without a support stool, impacts chest compressions on the dental chair.
Methods
Experiments were conducted on CPR training manikin on a dental chair. A stool was placed under the backrest of a dental chair to stabilize it. Chest compressions were performed for 5 minutes with or without a stool. Six values in chest compressions and the degree of fatigue were measured.
Results
According to the analysis of the quality of chest compressions without a stool or with a stool under the dental chair. The mean chest compression depth of With (57.29 ± 6.24mm) was significantly deeper than that of Without (53.86 ± 8.48 mm; p < 0.001). The mean chest compression rate and total chest compressions of With were significantly higher than that of Without. QCPR score of With (94.28 ± 10.57) was significantly higher than that of Without (72.0 ± 46.66; p < 0.001). The rating of perceived exertion of With (6.75 ± 1.20) was significantly lower than that of Without (8.75 ± 0.66; p < 0.001). Only the chest compression fraction and the chest compression rebound rate does not reach a significant difference.
Conclusions
The use of a support stool improved the quality of chest compressions on the dental chair and reduced rescuer fatigue. To perform effective CPR on a dental chair, it is important to stabilize the chair against chest compressions.
Clinical relevance:
Effective chest compressions could be performed in dental chairs by using a stool when cardiac arrest occurs during dental treatments.
“…The super cial edge of the stool's seat was set to vertically contact the backrest under the shoulders. 14,17 A cloth covered the side of the dental chair backrest so that participants could not see whether a stool is in place (with) or not (without).…”
Section: Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12] We previously reported on a method to reduce the vertical displacement of the dental chair during chest compressions. 13,14 This method stabilizes the dental chair by placing a stool under the backrest of the dental chair, reclining the dental chair, and bringing the stool into contact with the backrest. This method is recommended in the 2015 and 2021 European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines.…”
Background
To evaluate, how the influence of different with and without a support stool, impacts chest compressions on the dental chair.
Methods
Experiments were conducted on CPR training manikin on a dental chair. A stool was placed under the backrest of a dental chair to stabilize it. Chest compressions were performed for 5 minutes with or without a stool. Six values in chest compressions and the degree of fatigue were measured.
Results
According to the analysis of the quality of chest compressions without a stool or with a stool under the dental chair. The mean chest compression depth of With (57.29 ± 6.24mm) was significantly deeper than that of Without (53.86 ± 8.48 mm; p < 0.001). The mean chest compression rate and total chest compressions of With were significantly higher than that of Without. QCPR score of With (94.28 ± 10.57) was significantly higher than that of Without (72.0 ± 46.66; p < 0.001). The rating of perceived exertion of With (6.75 ± 1.20) was significantly lower than that of Without (8.75 ± 0.66; p < 0.001). Only the chest compression fraction and the chest compression rebound rate does not reach a significant difference.
Conclusions
The use of a support stool improved the quality of chest compressions on the dental chair and reduced rescuer fatigue. To perform effective CPR on a dental chair, it is important to stabilize the chair against chest compressions.
Clinical relevance:
Effective chest compressions could be performed in dental chairs by using a stool when cardiac arrest occurs during dental treatments.
“… 1. , 2. This technique is intended to provide greater stability by reclining the dental chair and placing a stool under the backrest so that it is in contact with the back of the chair.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For dental chairs with a heavily curved back outline, a stool placed under the shoulder compared to under the manual chest compression site significantly reduced vertical displacement, resulting in a large reduction ratio. 2 However, that study was based on only one type of dental chair.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.