1997
DOI: 10.1378/chest.111.6.1622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Two Long-Acting Vasoselective Calcium Antagonists in Pulmonary Hypertension Secondary to COPD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, calcium channel blockers are not indicated in patients with heart failure, but newer agents (e.g., amlodipine) have been shown to improve pulmonary hypertension in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and these drugs are safe in patients with heart failure. 30,31 Clinical use of these agents remains theoretical, however, and further study is needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, calcium channel blockers are not indicated in patients with heart failure, but newer agents (e.g., amlodipine) have been shown to improve pulmonary hypertension in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and these drugs are safe in patients with heart failure. 30,31 Clinical use of these agents remains theoretical, however, and further study is needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence to suggest that amlodipine may confer pulmonary specificity and has the advantage of being a once daily prescription (16). Amlodipine reduces pulmonary artery pressure and is well tolerated in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and PAH (17). The use of calcium-channel blockers in secondary PAH has been reported (18).…”
Section: Calcium-channel Blockersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39,40 In contrast, another study evaluating amlodipine and felodipine found that they decreased pulmonary pressures and increased oxygen delivery because cardiac output increased. 41 Despite this, the possible benefit of short-term increased cardiac output is overshadowed by the possibility of, worsened gas exchange, 42 and overall lack of proven long-term benefit. 43,44 Calcium channel antagonists should not be employed routinely in this patient population because of the absence of proven advantage and the risk of adverse effects such as systemic hypotension and cardiac conduction defects, in addition to those stated above.…”
Section: Oral Vasodilatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%