2005
DOI: 10.1016/s1120-1797(05)80012-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of two image fusion techniques in ct-on-rails localization of radiation delivery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 11 algorithms investigated in this study together with their corresponding optimal parameters (not shown for the algorithms unable to adequately register the phantom boundary). The parameters examined were smoothing during iterations (α 2 in the optical flow algorithms or Gaussian low-pass filter window size, σ , for demons algorithms), the number of passes at the first multigrid stage (finest resolution), a, the increment that the number of passes increases for subsequent multigrid stages, b, and the total number of iterations, N, run over the four multigrid stages (n = 1, 2, 3,4) (n = 1, 2, 3, 4), each with 2n passes and each pass having 10n iterations. These parameters resulted in a spatial accuracy convergence within 0.1 mm (∼20% of the minimum voxel size).…”
Section: Iib Deformable Image Registration Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 11 algorithms investigated in this study together with their corresponding optimal parameters (not shown for the algorithms unable to adequately register the phantom boundary). The parameters examined were smoothing during iterations (α 2 in the optical flow algorithms or Gaussian low-pass filter window size, σ , for demons algorithms), the number of passes at the first multigrid stage (finest resolution), a, the increment that the number of passes increases for subsequent multigrid stages, b, and the total number of iterations, N, run over the four multigrid stages (n = 1, 2, 3,4) (n = 1, 2, 3, 4), each with 2n passes and each pass having 10n iterations. These parameters resulted in a spatial accuracy convergence within 0.1 mm (∼20% of the minimum voxel size).…”
Section: Iib Deformable Image Registration Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For visual alignment mode, the two image sets are overlapped such that they can be aligned manually according to the anatomical structures location. Structure contours from the PLCT can also be displayed on the verification images to aid the alignment process 12, 13 . Normally the time needed for scanning plus registration is about 7 to 8 minutes 14 .…”
Section: Image Acquisition and Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structure contours from the PLCT can also be displayed on the verification images to aid the alignment process. 12,13 Normally the time needed for scanning plus registration is about 7 to 8 minutes. 14 The offsets measured by the registration system are then corrected by precise couch motion before proceeding to treatment.…”
Section: Ct On Railsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fung et al (16) compared two image fusion techniques during radiation release for cancer patients. The occurrence of unexpected translations and rotations led to the conclusion that the fusion through the visual alignment is more robust in some cases than the registration with control points; therefore, this was the elected method to study the patient position.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%