2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11517-009-0500-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of two Hilbert spectral analyses of heart rate variability

Abstract: The present paper compares the performance of two Hilbert spectral analyses when applied to a synthetic RR series from a nonstationary integral pulse frequency modulation model and to real RR series from a dataset of normal sinus arrhythmia. The Hilbert-Huang transformation based on empirical mode decomposition is compared to the presently introduced Hilbert-Olhede-Walden transformation based on stationary wavelet packet decomposition. The comparison gives consistent results pointing to a superior performance … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, there are other transformations besides wavelets that decompose a response series into the time-scale plane of Figure 2 in the main text. There are, for example, the short-time Fourier transformation (Gabor, 1946); the Hilbert transform combined with either Fourier bandpass decomposition (Bloomfield, 1976), empirical mode decomposition (Huang et al, 1998), or wavelet packet decomposition (Ihlen, 2009; Olhede & Walden, 2005); and the Wigner-Ville transform (Wigner, 1932), to name but a few. The wavelet approach has been chosen in the present article because it is the most utilized transformation in the multifractal analysis of multiplicative cascading processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, there are other transformations besides wavelets that decompose a response series into the time-scale plane of Figure 2 in the main text. There are, for example, the short-time Fourier transformation (Gabor, 1946); the Hilbert transform combined with either Fourier bandpass decomposition (Bloomfield, 1976), empirical mode decomposition (Huang et al, 1998), or wavelet packet decomposition (Ihlen, 2009; Olhede & Walden, 2005); and the Wigner-Ville transform (Wigner, 1932), to name but a few. The wavelet approach has been chosen in the present article because it is the most utilized transformation in the multifractal analysis of multiplicative cascading processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency-domain HRV measures rely on the estimation of power spectral density (PSD). Several methods were proposed in literature in order to estimate PSD of RR intervals [12,23,26,30]. In this study, we estimated PSD both by Welch's averaged modified periodogram [35] and by Lomb-Scamble periodogram [22].…”
Section: Long-term Hrv Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variation of beat-to-beat intervals, referred to as heart rate variability (HRV), can usually be calculated by analyzing the time series of R-R intervals from ECG. Various HRV spectral analyses have been proposed using the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), the maximum entropy method (MEM) and Wavelet Transform (WT) analysis [1,14,16,22,26,30,32,36]. The principle of spectral analysis is based on the fact that sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) activity affects heart rate (R-R interval) variability in specific frequency bands [6].…”
Section: Estimation Of Autonomic Nervous Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that one part of the ANS based on heart activity is reflected in fluctuations of the heart rate [6]. Many studies to date on heart rate variability (HRV) have been proposed using frequency domain analysis and time domain analysis [1,14,16,22,26,30,32,36], because HRV is an interesting and reliable quantitative approach to physiological analysis as well as a widely used clinical tool [14]. Recent studies have also used power spectral analysis to evaluate ANS activity from changes in blood pressure and heart rate during physical evaluation [33,37] or when a patient is under anaesthesia [9,12,13,15,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%