2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of two downscaling procedures to increase the spatial resolution of mapping actual evapotranspiration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These two seasons were characterized because in the initial stage crop needs smaller water requirements, whereas in the mid-season crop needs higher water requirements, as we can see in the next section. The ET c maps created in this study are in agreement with other researchers; for example, in [2,4,58,59], they generated ET c maps using c derived from remote sensing-based vegetation indices. Other researchers reported that c derived from canopy reflectance based vegetation index had the potential to estimate crop evapotranspiration at regional and field scales, for example, in [17,18,29,55,60,61].…”
Section: 3supporting
confidence: 88%
“…These two seasons were characterized because in the initial stage crop needs smaller water requirements, whereas in the mid-season crop needs higher water requirements, as we can see in the next section. The ET c maps created in this study are in agreement with other researchers; for example, in [2,4,58,59], they generated ET c maps using c derived from remote sensing-based vegetation indices. Other researchers reported that c derived from canopy reflectance based vegetation index had the potential to estimate crop evapotranspiration at regional and field scales, for example, in [17,18,29,55,60,61].…”
Section: 3supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Table 7 illustrates the statistical parameters between the fused LEs and measured LEs on the selected days for different land cover types. The results show an overall reasonably good agreement between the instantaneously fused LEs and measured LEs, with a slight underestimation of 13.1 W/m 2…”
Section: Validation Of Et Data Fused By the Sadfaet Model Using Grounsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…For each fine-resolution pixel at t m and t n , record T * and the LST retrieved from remote sensing data (T R ). (2). For a given pixel, if the remotely sensed T R at a fine resolution at t m is equal to or greater than T * and T R at t n is equal to or greater than T * as well, this pixel is considered to fall into CLASS 1, where no water is available to be evaporated for the soil component and the vegetation component transpires with a certain degree of soil water stress between t m and t n .…”
Section: Selection Of Similar Neighboring Pixelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternatively, soil moisture downscaling approaches, as explained in Wang et al (2016) and Jiang and Weng (2017), could be employed to obtain finer resolution soil moisture products for incorporating into SEB models. Recently proposed downscaled land surface temperature (LST) methods, particularly for the purpose of ET mapping (Ke et al, 2017;Mahour et al, 2017), could produce reliable ET maps by capturing temporal variation in soil moisture for days when Landsat images are not available.…”
Section: 4comparison Of Seasonal Sums Of Et Ec Et 0 and Predicmentioning
confidence: 99%