2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.04.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of three turbulence models for the prediction of parallel lobed jets in perforated panel optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(45 reference statements)
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8, a). This behavior is somewhat similar of that of twin jets [39][40][41]. The merging point MP is defined as the point on the central axis X= 0, where the centerline velocity WC = 0 (Fig.…”
Section: Airflow Pattern Analysissupporting
confidence: 57%
“…8, a). This behavior is somewhat similar of that of twin jets [39][40][41]. The merging point MP is defined as the point on the central axis X= 0, where the centerline velocity WC = 0 (Fig.…”
Section: Airflow Pattern Analysissupporting
confidence: 57%
“…In another study, it was reported that an accuracy of 5% to 10% could be achieved for the room airflow measurements using the two-component PIV technique [16]. In an investigation of a turbulent twin cross-shaped jet on a perforated panel diffuser [51], the maximal displacement error for the 2D PIV measurements was estimated to be 1.4%. For the stereoscopic PIV results, the maximal displacement error was equal to 0.8, 1.7 and 2.2% for the longitudinal, vertical and transversal directions respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The results showed that cross-shaped jets performed much better than the circular reference jets as a method of passive control of air diffusion systems for buildings. They also used PIV to measure the flow field of a turbulent twin cross-shaped jet on a perforated panel diffuser [51]. The experimental results were used to validate various numerical models.…”
Section: Ventilation Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Svensson, Rohdin, Moshfegh and Tummers [32] suggested that this problem may be overcome by using an adjusted combined point, defined as the point where the minimum velocity between two jets does not fall below 90% of the maximum velocity for the jet under consideration (U max,J ). The approach is somewhat similar to the method employed in [49], where a fixed velocity difference of 0.15 m/s, defined as the corrected combined point, is used to avoid uncertainties related to small fluctuations in the mean velocity profile.…”
Section: Adjusted Combined Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%