1986
DOI: 10.1016/0361-476x(86)90001-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of three short forms of the McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ref. [39] supported the use of local cutoff points as well: "in order to differentiate those 'at-risk' children a cutoff may use local norms for the best predictability for future achievement in that school system" (p. 15). Nevertheless, Ref.…”
Section: Discriminative Accuracy-sensitivity-specificity-roc Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ref. [39] supported the use of local cutoff points as well: "in order to differentiate those 'at-risk' children a cutoff may use local norms for the best predictability for future achievement in that school system" (p. 15). Nevertheless, Ref.…”
Section: Discriminative Accuracy-sensitivity-specificity-roc Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The content of the test consists of the cognitive subscales on the McCarthy (Verbal, Perceptual-Performance, Quantitative, and Memory/). Tbis short test of children's cognitive abilities has been shown to have good validitx^ and reliability (Harrington & Jennings, 1986). A general cognitive index was computed by summing the weighted raw scores on the cognitive subscales and then adjusting the scores for age in an equation that estimates the complete form score (see Kaufman, 1977).…”
Section: Observationmentioning
confidence: 99%