2014
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.21910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of three methods to regenerate activated carbon saturated by diesel fuels

Abstract: The three regeneration methods (thermal treatment, ultrasonication, and solvent extraction) were studied to regenerate the adsorptive capacity of the activated carbons (ACs) that were saturated by the nitrogen and sulphur containing compounds of diesel fuels. This is one of the few reports that give attention to the regeneration of heteroaromatic compounds contaminated ACs. Both model diesel and light cycled oil (LCO) were served as feedstocks. High regeneration rates can be obtained for all three approaches w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…µGACs physical, textural and chemical properties The properties of the 7 µGACs are summarized in Table 1. The values obtained for the BET surface were lower for CC, RS and NR (748, 527 and 885 m²/g, respectively) which are regenerated µGACs, showing as expected that reactivation had a substantial negative impact on ACs textural properties (Han et al, 2014). The BET surface was positively correlated with both the total porous volume (rPearson = 0.85, p-value = 0.014), the microporous volume (rPearson = 0.99, p-value < 0.001), the percentage of microporous volume (rPearson = 0.96, p-value < 0.001) and negatively correlated with the average pore size (rPearson = -0.95, p-value = 0.001).…”
Section: µGacs Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…µGACs physical, textural and chemical properties The properties of the 7 µGACs are summarized in Table 1. The values obtained for the BET surface were lower for CC, RS and NR (748, 527 and 885 m²/g, respectively) which are regenerated µGACs, showing as expected that reactivation had a substantial negative impact on ACs textural properties (Han et al, 2014). The BET surface was positively correlated with both the total porous volume (rPearson = 0.85, p-value = 0.014), the microporous volume (rPearson = 0.99, p-value < 0.001), the percentage of microporous volume (rPearson = 0.96, p-value < 0.001) and negatively correlated with the average pore size (rPearson = -0.95, p-value = 0.001).…”
Section: µGacs Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The VP decreased over the cycles therefore the areas under the curves of the regenerated ecat-R-SA samples decreased in all pore range [15,19,20]. The pore range increased over the cycles, which explains increase in the pore radius.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Regenerated Adsorbentmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Usually, regardless of the regeneration method used, the porosity, specific surface area and surface oxygen functional groups on the surface of the regenerated GAC are less than that of the virgin GAC. Mesopores formed during the regeneration are considered to promote the carbon adsorption capacity [39]. Correspondingly, BrO3 − removal ability was also recovered after GAC regeneration, but not much (Figure 2).…”
Section: Surface Functional Groups Of Three Gacs With Different Usage Timesmentioning
confidence: 97%