2012
DOI: 10.5849/forsci.11-051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Three Methods to Estimate Evapotranspiration in Two Contrasting Loblolly Pine Plantations: Age-Related Changes in Water Use and Drought Sensitivity of Evapotranspiration Components

Abstract: Increasing variability of rainfall patterns requires detailed understanding of the pathways of water loss from ecosystems to optimize carbon uptake and management choices. In the current study we characterized the usability of three alternative methods of different rigor for quantifying stand-level evapotranspiration (ET), partitioned ET into tree transpiration (T), understory transpiration, interception, and soil evaporation (E S ) and determined their sensitivity to drought, and evaluated the reliability of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
74
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
5
74
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The study area is flat, about 3 m a.s.l. and has been ditched (fourth-order ditches at 100 m spacing) to manage the water table and improve tree productivity (Domec et al, 2012). The soil is Belhaven series Histosol, with a 50-85 cm organic layer over coarse glacial outwash sand .…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study area is flat, about 3 m a.s.l. and has been ditched (fourth-order ditches at 100 m spacing) to manage the water table and improve tree productivity (Domec et al, 2012). The soil is Belhaven series Histosol, with a 50-85 cm organic layer over coarse glacial outwash sand .…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While EC is a widely used observation method and provides an important data source to many research fields , it measures turbulent fluxes over a relatively small footprint area (10 2 -10 4 m 2 ), which is determined by the microclimate conditions around the flux tower and the instrument height. Catchment water balance is also a frequently used method, calculating ET from long-term precipitation and streamflow observations with the assumption that the soil water storage change is negligible (Domec et al, 2012;Wilson et al, 2001). All these observation methods have their inherent advantages and limitations, especially when considering both temporal and spatial resolution issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Sun et al (2010) showed that transpiration and soil evaporation accounted for about 83 % of total ET. In forested watersheds dominated by closed canopies and thick litter layers, soil evaporation is likely to be minimal (e.g., Ford et al, 2007), though Domec et al (2012) report a value of 9 % of ET attributed to soil evaporation from a mid-rotation managed pine plantation. Interception losses or canopy evaporation losses are closely linked to forest structure - Bryant et al (2005) reported interception losses equivalent to 17.7 and 18.6 % of total precipitation for a mixed forest and lowland hardwood forest, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on Ford et al (2007) and Wilson et al (2006), reported transpiration losses ranged between 53 and 57 % of ET, with the balance comprising canopy interception and direct soil evaporation. Using eddy flux tower measurements, Domec et al (2012) showed that transpiration accounted for 70 % of total ET in a mid-rotation managed pine forest. Similarly, Sun et al (2010) showed that transpiration and soil evaporation accounted for about 83 % of total ET.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is risky to assume that the moisture variations in the root zone of a crop can be represented by a few moisture samples because the water extraction amplitude is uneven in the different soil moisture monitoring positions. So, it is safer to monitor soil moisture at various positions of the root zone (Domec et al, 2012). …”
Section: Et Variation With Different Numbers Of Radial Distances (R 1mentioning
confidence: 99%