2015
DOI: 10.1177/0264619615610161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of three materials used for tactile symbols to communicate colour to children and young people with visual impairments

Abstract: A series of 14 tactile symbols were developed to represent different colours and shades for children and young people who are blind or have visual impairment. A study compared three different methods for representing the symbols: (1) embroidered thread, (2) heated ‘swell’ paper, and (3) representation in plastic using Additive Manufacturing (AM; three-dimensional printing). The results show that for all three materials, the recognition of particular symbols varied between 2.40 and 3.95 s. The average times for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results were similar to another study by Ramsamy-Iranah et al . [ 40 ], which suggested that a larger height contrast for 3D symbols was more easily differentiated from other components by the blind. These findings reflect the need for a solution that is able to provide comprehensive medication information to BVI patients, yet simple in delivery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results were similar to another study by Ramsamy-Iranah et al . [ 40 ], which suggested that a larger height contrast for 3D symbols was more easily differentiated from other components by the blind. These findings reflect the need for a solution that is able to provide comprehensive medication information to BVI patients, yet simple in delivery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ramsamy-Iranah and colleagues designed 14 tactile symbols conveying color information. Results indicated that tactile symbols on a plastic surface can be useful to facilitate color recognition for children who have visual impairment (Ramsamy-Iranah et al, 2016). In addition, a recent study by our research team attempted to express 9 representative colors (pink, red, orange, yellow, green, blue, navy, purple, and brown) using tactile grating patterns (Shin et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although object outlines are crucial for comprehending artworks (Arnheim, 1990), color perception is another substantial part of art appreciation (Cho et al, 2021; Shin et al, 2020). Therefore, it is essential to establish a perceptual link between colors and texture properties (Ramsamy-Iranah et al, 2016). There have been a number of suggestions to create a one-to-one factitious link, for example, braille patterns (Brunot & Brunot, 1986; Grant et al, 2000), braille color code in interactive tactile graphics (Taras & Ertl, 2009), and vibrotactile actuators (Tapson et al, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In learning, AM could be used to enhance braille learning with projects such as Tagalog and Fittle (used in the deafblind program at Perkins School for the Blind, https://www.perkins.org/; Arbes et al, 2018;Jain et al, 2018;Kleck, 2020). AM could also improve functioning in ICF domains such as "self-care" (i.e., 3D printable printlets project; Awad et al, 2020;Wong et al, 2020), "domestic life" (i.e., tagging systems for color and adaptations for appliances; Guo et al, 2017;Ramsamy-Iranah et al, 2016); and even "community, social and civic life" notably by enabling tactile adaptation of popular leisure activities and improving accessibility to art (with the tactile translation of paintings and recreation of sculptures), architecture, and cultural sites (Gabry, 2018;Karastoyanov et al, 2019;Montusiewicz et al, 2018;Rossetti et al, 2018;Voigt & Martens, 2006;Watkin, 2016). Furthermore, even though most AM studies focus on younger populations in the context of education, 3D printed models can also be useful to older people (i.e., group 3 with age-related deafblindness).…”
Section: Am For Communication Learning and Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%