2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2011.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of three feature selection methods for object-based classification of sub-decimeter resolution UltraCam-L imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
1
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
65
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Twelve of the 39 images available for the training period were removed. We evaluated the separability of the F and NF distributions for NDVIMD and HVHHmt using the normalized Jeffries-Matusita distance (JM) [73]. JM has a finite dynamic range from 0 (inseparable) to 2 (separable).…”
Section: Deriving F and Nf Pdfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twelve of the 39 images available for the training period were removed. We evaluated the separability of the F and NF distributions for NDVIMD and HVHHmt using the normalized Jeffries-Matusita distance (JM) [73]. JM has a finite dynamic range from 0 (inseparable) to 2 (separable).…”
Section: Deriving F and Nf Pdfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These products have certainly improved our understanding of regional and global land cover distribution and their change status. Unfortunately, due to the relatively low spatial resolution, they are insufficient for detailed land cover mapping for those areas with complex and high heterogeneous landscapes such as the urban environment, which is featured by its small-sized elements (e.g., buildings, roads and lawns) combined with complicated spatial patterns [13,14]. This limitation greatly hinders researchers and policy makers from taking full advantage of these maps to support their various and particular applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Features were first selected to construct a classification decision tree (De'ath and Fabricius 2000; Laliberte et al, 2012). The resultant decision tree suggested that density and shape index were the two most efficient features, which were then used to develop the ruleset to identify particles from SEM micrographs.…”
Section: Object-based Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%