2017
DOI: 10.2166/hydro.2017.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of three dual drainage models: shallow water vs local inertial vs diffusive wave

Abstract: In this study we compared three overland flow models, a full dynamic model (shallow water equation), a local inertial equations model (gravity wave model), and a diffusive wave model (parallel diffusive wave model). The three models are coupled with the same full dynamic sewer network model (SIPSON). We adopted the volume exchange between sewer and overland flow models, and the hydraulic head and discharge rates at the linked manholes to evaluate differences between the models. For that purpose we developed a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(36 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The minor system, the enclosed drainage system, conveys the flow underground or through enclosed structures to remove the water from the affected areas, is usually modeled through a network of 1‐D surchargeable pipes, culverts, or small watercourses. The connection between both systems is made through a linkage, which includes the urban drainage linking elements such as gullies, manholes, and gutters, and is usually modeled as a calibratable single weir/orifice equation (Martins, Leandro, Chen, et al, ) as a simplification. The accuracy of such a simplification is dependent on the appropriate determination of both an energy loss coefficient, as well as the prevailing hydraulic head within the linkage structure (Rubinato et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minor system, the enclosed drainage system, conveys the flow underground or through enclosed structures to remove the water from the affected areas, is usually modeled through a network of 1‐D surchargeable pipes, culverts, or small watercourses. The connection between both systems is made through a linkage, which includes the urban drainage linking elements such as gullies, manholes, and gutters, and is usually modeled as a calibratable single weir/orifice equation (Martins, Leandro, Chen, et al, ) as a simplification. The accuracy of such a simplification is dependent on the appropriate determination of both an energy loss coefficient, as well as the prevailing hydraulic head within the linkage structure (Rubinato et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HEC-RAS solves either 2D Saint Venant or 2D diffusion-wave equations. The latter allows faster calculation and has greater stability due to its complex numerical schemes (Martins et al, 2017). Due to these advantages and suitability for use in real-time inundation forecast (Henonin et al, 2013), we have used the diffusive-wave model that was previously set-up, calibrated and validated in Bhola et al (2018a) and Bhola et al (2018b).…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is convenient because the water level (z) is smaller when compared with the flood extent area (x, y). [53]. It is also possible to simulate using the diffusion wave equations to reduce the computational time of the model, but this would not then use the acceleration and pressure terms [54].…”
Section: Reflections On the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%