2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.03.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of three algorithms for chromatograms alignment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
99
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
99
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficiency and simplicity of the alignment algorithm is attributed to using as landmarks multiple peptides identified with high probabilities (p>0.99 in these experiments). Thus, it is not necessary to use complicated nonlinear alignment algorithms [36,37] developed for applications where sample component identifications are not available at the alignment stage. In general, our alignment algorithm worked well for chromatograms having at least 10 −15 common identified peptides across the chomatogram to use as landmarks.…”
Section: Performance Of the Q-mend Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficiency and simplicity of the alignment algorithm is attributed to using as landmarks multiple peptides identified with high probabilities (p>0.99 in these experiments). Thus, it is not necessary to use complicated nonlinear alignment algorithms [36,37] developed for applications where sample component identifications are not available at the alignment stage. In general, our alignment algorithm worked well for chromatograms having at least 10 −15 common identified peptides across the chomatogram to use as landmarks.…”
Section: Performance Of the Q-mend Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 O pré-tratamento aplicado a fim de corrigir esses deslocamentos é o alinhamento dos picos dos cromatogramas. Várias técnicas de alinhamento foram propostas na literatura.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…However, due to several experiments issues, one may observe shifts between these peaks, which may be potentially harmful for subsequent analyzes. Most of solutions to peak alignment are based on time warping (see [46] for a comparison between three matching methods).…”
Section: Matching Identification and Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%