2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2012.6425888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of thermal zone aggregation methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model used for this study has 41 states: one for zone air and the rest for building structure 3 . It assumes well-mixed air and uses time-invariant convection coefficients.…”
Section: Building Thermal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model used for this study has 41 states: one for zone air and the rest for building structure 3 . It assumes well-mixed air and uses time-invariant convection coefficients.…”
Section: Building Thermal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, one may reduce the model size using balanced truncation, which reconfigures the state space. We have chosen to retain the full-order model to maximize accuracy and preserve physical intuition.See[3] for a survey of methods that reduce state space size while preserving structure 4. Daily ground temperature is available for free through on-line sources such as the U.S.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%