1976
DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0480285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the ultrastructure of spray-frozen and freeze-etched or freeze-dried bull and boar spermatozoa with that after chemical fixation

Abstract: Summary. The ultrastructure of bull and boar spermatozoa was investigated following different cryopreparation methods and chemical fixation. Spray-freezing was used for cryofixation in both freeze-etching and freeze-drying studies. Freeze-etching of boar spermatozoa revealed that the arrangement of the postnuclear striations differed from that in the bull. Freeze-drying gave excellent results for structural preservation, which were equal to those of chemical fixation. Some structural details not visible in che… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We could observe ultrastructural details of spermatozoa with normal or pathologic morphology, but also we could describe the alterations induced by osmotic processes or to the cold-shock treatment. Several authors have proposed different methods for the treatment of spermatozoa for ultrastructural study (Pfaller et al, 1976;Rozinek, 1977). However, the advantage of using our technique is to avoid centrifugation, and that the ultrastructural details can be defined ''in situ,'' thus preserving the functional relationship of the vesicles and the target cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We could observe ultrastructural details of spermatozoa with normal or pathologic morphology, but also we could describe the alterations induced by osmotic processes or to the cold-shock treatment. Several authors have proposed different methods for the treatment of spermatozoa for ultrastructural study (Pfaller et al, 1976;Rozinek, 1977). However, the advantage of using our technique is to avoid centrifugation, and that the ultrastructural details can be defined ''in situ,'' thus preserving the functional relationship of the vesicles and the target cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been employed by many authors in the field of conventional electron microscopy (Sjostrand and Kretzer, 1975;Pfaller et al, 1976;Coulter and Terracio, 1977;Coulter and Elde, 1979;Pfaller, 1979;Schwabe and Terracio, 1980;Terracio and Schwabe, 1981;. For the FD procedure, fresh tissues are quickly frozen and the tissue water is removed by sublimation at high vacuum conditions and low temperatures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bittermann et al (1992) FS (SJF) Paramecium Geanacopoulos and Gear (1988) FF, FE Blood platelets Horowitz et al (1990) FS Nuclei Knoll et al (1991) FF, FS (SJF) Paramecium Lang and Bronk (1978) FF, FE Mitochondria Lang et al (1976) FF, FE Mitochondria Linder and Staehelin (1979) FS Leptomonas Miller and Dahl (1982) FF Liposomes Pfaller and Rovan (1978) FD, FE Spermatozoa Pfaller et al (1976) FD, FE Spermatozoa Plattner (1971) FE Spermatozoa Plattner et al (1972) FF, FE Chlorella, Euglena, spermatozoa Plattner et al (1973) FF, FE Aerobacter, Chlorella, Euglena, Paramecium, Selenastrum, spermatozoa Rand et al (1985) FF Vesicle fusion Williams (1953) FD TMV, red blood cells Fig. 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%