1989
DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(89)80930-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the trauma score, the revised trauma score, and the pediatric trauma score

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
46
1
7

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
46
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This score has been shown to have good intraobserver reproducibility, is easy to use in children, and has been shown to correlate significantly with outcome in other traumatic injuries. 16,17 …”
Section: Clinical Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This score has been shown to have good intraobserver reproducibility, is easy to use in children, and has been shown to correlate significantly with outcome in other traumatic injuries. 16,17 …”
Section: Clinical Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could relieve a caregiver of the computational task, or offer a double check when less experienced caregivers (e.g., basic life support) are making difficult triage decisions (e.g., nonurban settings with significant transport times). Given an automated functionality, it would be more practical for emergency medical systems to routinely incorporate physiologic scores in their triage methodologies (presumably in conjunction with other criteria, given the limitations of triage by RTS or PHI alone [3][4][5] ).…”
Section: Potential Clinical Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best-known include Champion's Revised Trauma Score (RTS) 1 and the Prehospital Index (PHI) 2 ; these scores are generated from formulas into which are entered a set of physiologic measurements. Although their discriminatory power is moderate, [3][4][5] prehospital severity scores can in principle be useful tools for civilian triage methodologies, for military triage 6 and for triage after a mass casualty incident. 7 Of course, severity scores can be no more accurate than the physiologic measurements input into the formulas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validity of the pediatric Glasgow Coma Score (GDC), Trauma Score, Revised Trauma Score, and the Pediatric Trauma Score (PTS) has been proven. [6][7][8] Developed in 1987 by Tepas et al 9 the PTS is patterned after the evaluation process of the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS), and it is specifically designed for the triage of children with traumatic injury. 5 It is the sum of six parameters incorporating size as a surrogate for age and vital signs plus organ-specific injury data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%