2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2014.06.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the transition metal 3d1 crystal field splitting with the lanthanide 5d1 crystal field splitting in compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the position of the 4f n level remains at more or less the same energy, the 5d 1 position shifts significantly, leading to changes in the energy difference between ground and excited state. The effects that influence the 5d levels are the same as those reported for the 3d states of transition metal ions‐number and type of ligands, coordination arrangement, crystal field splitting, nephelauxetic effect or degree of covalency and, in the solid state, also the type of cation site. Consequently, for instance, Eu 2+ in some nitrides, emits in the orange or red color region, while UV emission can be found in some fluorides .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…While the position of the 4f n level remains at more or less the same energy, the 5d 1 position shifts significantly, leading to changes in the energy difference between ground and excited state. The effects that influence the 5d levels are the same as those reported for the 3d states of transition metal ions‐number and type of ligands, coordination arrangement, crystal field splitting, nephelauxetic effect or degree of covalency and, in the solid state, also the type of cation site. Consequently, for instance, Eu 2+ in some nitrides, emits in the orange or red color region, while UV emission can be found in some fluorides .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…[170][171][172] Positive correlations showed up, however with an accuracy which is worse than for similar rules for the lanthanides, standard errors being typically of the order of 0.5 eV. Rogers and Dorenbos gathered data to extend the chemical shift model to transition metal ions with a nd 1 ground state configuration (n = 3, 4, 5).…”
Section: Roads For Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E V2+ and E Sc2+ in YAGG were spread near -3.30±0.22 eV and -2.88±0.06eV, respectively. The VRBE of the single electron in the lowest energy 3d, 4d, and 5d levels in group IIIa, IVa, Va and VIa transition metal (TM) and lanthanide (Ln) ions spread ±1 eV around a mean value[20][21][22][23]. Therefore, it is regarded that the VRBE of each TM 2+ in Y 3 Al 5-x Ga x O 12 has the reasonable range.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%