1973
DOI: 10.1159/000208323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of the Three <i>in vivo</i> Assays for Haemopoietic Stem Cells

Abstract: The effect of a proliferation-independent (nitrogen mustard) and 4 proliferation-dependent (methotrexate, vinblastine, cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil) cytotoxic agents has been investigated, concurrently, on the 3 in vivo assays (colony-forming units, erythroid repopulating ability and granulocytic repopulating ability) for haemopoietic tem cells. These preliminary results show that the proliferation-dependent agents produce different responses in the 3 assays consistent with the presence of 3 different c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1980
1980
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differ ences in the sensitivity of erythroid and granulocytic repopulating cells and pluripotential stem cells (CFUs) after single doses of cytotoxic agents indicate that these are distinct populations of precursor cells and it has been suggested that the repopulating cell compartments are composed of commit ted stem cells [Dunn and Constable, 1973]. Further evidence for the separate identity of erythroid and granulocytic repopulating cells has been provided by the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Differ ences in the sensitivity of erythroid and granulocytic repopulating cells and pluripotential stem cells (CFUs) after single doses of cytotoxic agents indicate that these are distinct populations of precursor cells and it has been suggested that the repopulating cell compartments are composed of commit ted stem cells [Dunn and Constable, 1973]. Further evidence for the separate identity of erythroid and granulocytic repopulating cells has been provided by the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%