2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.12.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the speech recognition and pitch ranking abilities of children using a unilateral cochlear implant, bimodal stimulation or bilateral hearing aids

Abstract: ObjectiveThe present study compared the speech recognition and pitch ranking abilities of normally-hearing children (n = 15) to children using a cochlear implant (CI) alone (n = 8), bilateral hearing aids (HAs) (n = 6), or bimodal stimulation (BMS) (n = 9). It was hypothesised that users of BMS would score higher on tasks of speech and pitch perception than children using a CI alone, but not children using HAs. MethodsParticipants were assessed on tasks of monosyllabic word recognition in quiet, sentence recog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They hypothesized that the reduction in available F0 voicing cues makes sound source segregation difficult. Additional support for this hypothesis is found in studies of bimodal hearing in which the CI user has residual hearing in the non-implanted ear (Looi and Radford 2011;Rader et al 2013). The general finding of these studies is that the residual acoustic hearing improves both complex tone pitch perception as well as speech reception in noise even when the acoustic hearing does not provide sufficient cues for speech reception by itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…They hypothesized that the reduction in available F0 voicing cues makes sound source segregation difficult. Additional support for this hypothesis is found in studies of bimodal hearing in which the CI user has residual hearing in the non-implanted ear (Looi and Radford 2011;Rader et al 2013). The general finding of these studies is that the residual acoustic hearing improves both complex tone pitch perception as well as speech reception in noise even when the acoustic hearing does not provide sufficient cues for speech reception by itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The findings of Looi and Radford 79 suggest that results for children may be slightly different. They compared four groups of children-NH, CI alone, HA alone, and children using BMS-on a pitch-ranking task.…”
Section: Music Perception With Electro-acoustic Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…While much research has been conducted regarding speech perception, speech prosody and localization, fewer studies have addressed bimodal music perception in the pediatric population. Looi and Radford [11] compared children with NH to children with bilateral HAs, CI only and bimodal listeners. They postulated the recipients with the bimodal listening condition would show superior performance on pitch ranking when compared to children with CI only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%