1974
DOI: 10.1016/s0091-6773(74)91188-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the role of the motor cortex in recovery from cerebellar damage in young and adult rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(22 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, other studies have reported contradictory findings ( Aarsen et al , 2006 ; Aarsen et al , 2009 ). In agreement with these studies, pioneering observations, in animals, have shown that early hemicerebellectomies predict higher levels of functional deficits than late hemicerebellectomies ( Smith et al , 1974 ; Gramsbergen, 1982 ); although contradictory conclusions have been published ( Molinari et al , 1990 ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…However, other studies have reported contradictory findings ( Aarsen et al , 2006 ; Aarsen et al , 2009 ). In agreement with these studies, pioneering observations, in animals, have shown that early hemicerebellectomies predict higher levels of functional deficits than late hemicerebellectomies ( Smith et al , 1974 ; Gramsbergen, 1982 ); although contradictory conclusions have been published ( Molinari et al , 1990 ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Cerebellar Purkinje cells contain low-affinity NGF receptor and its mRNA Pioro and Cuello, 1990). A possible role of bloodborne NGF in cerebellar function is suggested by physiological studies in which NGF introduced subcutaneously in neonatal mouse pups accelerates the maturation of some sensorimotor indices which are dependent upon the cerebellum (Smith et al, 1974). It is not known at this time, however, if the effects are secondary to the hypertrophy of peripheral sensory neurons or to a primary effect on NGF-sensitive cerebellar neurons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%