1983
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.1983.tb01530.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of the Relationship Enhancement Program and the Minnesota Couple Communication Program*

Abstract: This study assessed the comparative effectiveness of the Relationship Enhancement Program (RE) and the Minnesota Couples Communication Program (CC). Couples in the treatment groups (RE‐26, CC‐20) received RE and CC training from certified leaders. Results at posttesting showed that RE was more effective in increasing marital communication (both behavioral and self‐report) and marital satisfaction than CC. A three‐month follow‐up showed that RE couples' outcome remained superior to CC couples'. Additional analy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
2

Year Published

1986
1986
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] Earlier programs contain very similar approaches in their themes, such as active listening skills, [25][26][27]29,46 conflict resolution skills, 25-27,46,47 establishing empathy between spouses, 25,26,29,47 defining and strengthening the objectives of the marriage, 29,46,47 and sharing responsibilities. 29,46 However, our program differs from other improvement programs in that it focuses on improving many unique communication skills.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] Earlier programs contain very similar approaches in their themes, such as active listening skills, [25][26][27]29,46 conflict resolution skills, 25-27,46,47 establishing empathy between spouses, 25,26,29,47 defining and strengthening the objectives of the marriage, 29,46,47 and sharing responsibilities. 29,46 However, our program differs from other improvement programs in that it focuses on improving many unique communication skills.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,46 However, our program differs from other improvement programs in that it focuses on improving many unique communication skills. [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]46,47 Some of these unique skills, not used in other programs, are the use of ego-strengthening language, anger management (sharing his/her anger with the spouse through body language and the use of humor and relaxation), and the use of "I" language. In addition, we used a variety of different techniques to modify spouses' behavior and employed a wide range of activities, including role play, discussion, demonstrations, sharing feelings with the group, group experiences, homework, behavioral modeling, behavioral negotiation, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The exception is a well-designed study by Brock and Joanning (1983) that compared CC with the Relationship Enhancement Program (RE). RE is conducted in small groups of three couples each and emphasizes the teaching and practice of Rogerian communication skills.…”
Section: Desigtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Em vários países, a EAD tem auxiliado na avaliação da eficácia de terapias de casais (Adam & Cingras, 1982;Brock & Joanning, 1983;Cáceres & Cáceres, 2006;Eizaguirre, 2002;Figueiras, Machado & Alves, 2002;Jacobson, 1984;Jacobson & Follete, 1985;Laham, 1990;Peçanha, 2005;Perlin & Diniz, 2005;Prouty, Markowski & Barnes, 2000 Cronbach, a estrutura e a fidedignidade da EAD, respectivamente, com uma amostra de indivíduos (coabitantes e não coabitantes com seus parceiros). Análises Fatoriais convencionais, além de serem usadas para o desenvolvimento de novas escalas, podem ser utilizadas para validação de instrumentos existentes usando sujeitos diferentes daqueles que constituíram a amostra original da construção da escala (Burnett & Dart, 1997 …”
unclassified