1980
DOI: 10.1099/00222615-13-4-541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of the Properties of Klebsiella Strains Isolated From Different Sources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the tests described in this paper indicate that whilst the isolates are all definitely identifiable as klebsiellas, there is no obvious way in which they differ from those found in hospital and other environments (Cooke et al 1979a(Cooke et al , b, 1980Edmondson et al 1980). All these strains fell into the five groups described by Edmondson et al (1980) except one which was positive in the indole test and negative in the other 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The results of the tests described in this paper indicate that whilst the isolates are all definitely identifiable as klebsiellas, there is no obvious way in which they differ from those found in hospital and other environments (Cooke et al 1979a(Cooke et al , b, 1980Edmondson et al 1980). All these strains fell into the five groups described by Edmondson et al (1980) except one which was positive in the indole test and negative in the other 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…the faecal coliform test, the production of acid and gas in bile-salt broth at 44-5°C, growth in nutrient broth at 10°C, indole production and pectin liquefaction. The results of these tests are shown in Table 1, and with one exception (the strain which was positive in the indole tests and negative in the other 3) they all fell into one of the five groups described by Edmondson et al (1980) 21 (1) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations