A Comparison of the Performance of Different Interpolation Methods in Replicating Rainfall Magnitudes under Different Climatic Conditions in Chongqing Province (China)

Abstract

Precipitation is considered a crucial component in the hydrological cycle and changes in its spatial pattern directly influence the water resources. We compare different interpolation techniques in predicting the spatial distribution pattern of precipitation in Chongqing. Six interpolation methods, i.e., Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW), Radial Basis Function (RBF), Diffusion Interpolation with Barrier (DIB), Kernel Interpolation with Barrier (KIB), Ordinary Kriging (OK) and Empirical Bayesian Kriging (EBK), were applied to estimate different rainfall patterns. Annual mean, rainy season and dry-season precipitation was calculated from the daily precipitation time series of 34 meteorological stations with a time span of 1991 to 2019, based on Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation (LOOCV), Mean Square Error (MSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), Symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error (SMAPE) and Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency coefficient (NSE) as validation indexes of the applied models for calculating the error degree and accuracy. Correlation test and Spearman coefficient was performed on the estimated and observed values. A method combining Entropy Weight and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (Entropy-Weighted TOPSIS) was introduced to rank the performance of six interpolation methods. The results indicate that interpolation technique performs better in estimating during periods of low precipitation (i.e., dry season, relative to rainy season and mean annual). The performance priorities of the six methods under the combined multiple precipitation distribution patterns are KIB > EBK > OK > RBF > DIB > IDW. Among them, KIB method has the highest accuracy which maps more accurate precipitation surfaces, with the disadvantage that estimation error is prone to outliers. EBK method is the second highest, and IDW method has the lowest accuracy with a high degree of error. This paper provides information for the application of interpolation methods in estimating rainfall spatial pattern and for water resource management of concerned regions.

Interpolation of Point Prevalence Rate of the Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Subtype H5N8 Second Phase Epidemic in South Korea

“…Whenever there is a spatially correlated distance or directional bias in the data, kriging is the best method to use [ 55 ]. For examining spatial variability in the data, a variogram model was used.…”

Estimation and Analysis of Seasonal Rainfall Distribution and Potential of Türkiye and Its 25 Main Watersheds

“…EBK, a combination of the kriging interpolation technique and Bayes' theory, is a simple and reliable method for automatic data interpolation of the variables [15,25,34]. As a result, EBK users do not have to manually interfere with the variables to obtain more accurate results [35].…”

“…Antal et al [24] compared local polynomial interpolation (LPI), radial basis function (RBF), global polynomial interpolation (GPI), empirical Bayesian kriging regression (EBKR), universal cokriging (UCoK), IDW, and OCoK methods using annual precipitation data in Portugal, and they found that the EBKR method provided the most outstanding performance. Yang and Xing [25] compared kernel interpolation with barrier (KIB), diffusion interpolation with barrier (DIB), IDW, RBF, OK, and EBK methods using precipitation data from different time series in Chongqing (China), and they found that the KIB method provided the highest accuracy. Caloiero et al [26] compared the IDW, OK, KED, and OCoK methods using monthly precipitation data in New Zealand and found OCoK to be the optimal method.…”

Interpolating climate variables by using INLA and the SPDE approach

“…Several interpolation techniques are available to produce gridded maps from scattered in situ measurements of climate variables (Chen & Guo, 2017; Hofstra et al, 2008; Yang & Xing, 2021) and most of them are implemented in software packages for the R language (R Core Team, 2021). For example, gstat (Pebesma, 2004) is a well‐known and user‐friendly R package which implements both deterministic (inverse distance weighting [IDW]) and geostatistical (traditional kriging and its variants) methods.…”