2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-45157-0_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of the Performance of Different Metaheuristics on the Timetabling Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
129
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
129
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[3]), but contains more information than the exclusive use of room/event pheromones (e.g. [2]). Our pheromone concept is further supported by the observation that the assignment of a room is less critical in comparison to the assignment to a timeslot.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3]), but contains more information than the exclusive use of room/event pheromones (e.g. [2]). Our pheromone concept is further supported by the observation that the assignment of a room is less critical in comparison to the assignment to a timeslot.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various combinations of local area and global area based algorithms have been reported to solve timetabling problems in the literature [15,51,57,36,3]. In addition, it is also being increasingly realized that EAs without incorporation of problem-specific knowledge do not perform as well as mathematical programming based algorithms on certain classes of timetabling problems [13].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers have used GAs to solve course timetabling problems [5,25,40,48]. Rossi-Doria et al [51] compared different meta-heuristics to solve the UCTP. They concluded that conventional GAs do not give good results among a number of approaches developed for the UCTP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, several researchers have tackled the course timetabling problem, particulary the set of 11 instances proposed by Socha et al [14]. Among the algorithms proposed there are: a MAX-MIN ant system by Socha et al [14]; a tabu search hyper-heuristic strategy by Burke et al [7]; an evolutionary algorithm, ant colony optimisation, iterated local search, simulated annealing and tabu search by Rossi-Doria et al [13]; fuzzy multiple heuristic ordering by Asmuni et al [5]; variable neighbourhood search by Abdullah et al [1]; iterative improvement with composite neighbourhoods by Abdullah et al [2,4]; a graphbased hyper-heuristic by Burke et al [9] and a hybrid evolutionary algorithm by Abdullah et al [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%