A Comparison of the Oxidation and Nitridation Properties of Selected Chromia- and Alumina-Forming Alloys at 800 °C

Abstract

Three FeCrAl alloys and two chromia-formers (a stainless steel, and a Ni-base alloy) have been exposed in four environments (dry air, air + 20% H2O, 20% H2 + 20% H2O + Ar and 95% N2 + 5% H2) for 168 h at 800 °C. The corroded samples were investigated by SEM/EDS, XRD and gravimetry, and the formation of CrO2(OH)2(g) was measured as a function of time using a denuder technique. The Fe-base alloy formed a Cr-rich protective oxide scale in dry air and wet air but suffered break-away oxidation in 20% H2 + 20% H2O + Ar. In contrast, the Ni-base alloy suffered extensive NiO formation and internal oxidation in dry air and wet air but formed a protective chromia scale in 20% H2 + 20% H2O. All three FeCrAl alloys formed protective alumina scales in dry air, wet air and 20% H2 + 20% H2O + Ar. The FeCrAl alloy Kanthal APMT was severely nitrided in the 95% N2 + 5% H2 environment due to defects in the oxide scale associated with RE-rich inclusions which allowed nitrogen to enter the alloy. In contrast, the two Cr-lean FeCrAl alloys Kanthal EF101 and Kanthal EF100 did not suffer nitridation at all.

The Isothermal Oxidation of a New Polycrystalline Turbine Disk Ni-Based Superalloy at 800 °C and Its Modification with Pre-oxidation

“…However, Cr 2 O 3 loses efficacy as a protective oxide at higher temperatures as volatile oxide species are formed, which reach comparatively high vapor pressures. [3] It is well established that Al 2 O 3 provides a more stable and protective oxide layer at higher temperatures than Cr 2 O 3 , making it a more attractive option for components that experience such conditions in service. [4] Therefore, the development of polycrystalline superalloys that form protective scales of Al 2 O 3 (Type III) instead of Cr 2 O 3 could offer benefits for future more fuel-efficient gas turbine engines.…”