1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(99)80535-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the neurological toxicities of cisplatin-paclitaxel (PT) and cisplatin-cyclophosphamide (PC)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In an earlier report (preliminary analysis) of this work ( 14 ) , additional differences were found between the two treatment arms, that is, during treatment, a higher incidence in the PT arm of insomnia both as a toxicity and by patient assessment; worse patient‐assessed motor impairment in the PT arm during treatment; and, in the post treatment period, an increased duration of sensory toxicity in the PT arm. Also duration differences in ≥grade 3 sensory and motor toxicity during treatment and ≥grade 3 hearing toxicity in the follow‐up period were also reported in error.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In an earlier report (preliminary analysis) of this work ( 14 ) , additional differences were found between the two treatment arms, that is, during treatment, a higher incidence in the PT arm of insomnia both as a toxicity and by patient assessment; worse patient‐assessed motor impairment in the PT arm during treatment; and, in the post treatment period, an increased duration of sensory toxicity in the PT arm. Also duration differences in ≥grade 3 sensory and motor toxicity during treatment and ≥grade 3 hearing toxicity in the follow‐up period were also reported in error.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In an earlier report (preliminary analysis) of this work (14) , additional differences were found between the two treatment arms, that is, during treatment, a higher incidence in the PT arm of insomnia both as a toxicity and by patient assessment; worse patientassessed motor impairment in the PT arm during treatment; and, in the post treatment period, an increased duration of sensory toxicity in the PT arm. Also duration differences in grade 3 sensory and motor toxicity during treatment and grade 3 hearing toxicity in the follow-up period were also reported in error.…”
Section: Notementioning
confidence: 52%