1990
DOI: 10.1002/bit.260361110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the Michaelis–Menten and HCH‐1 models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…shrinking site hydrolysis model with Langmuir-type adsorption isotherm (Humphrey, 1979;Movagharnejad et al, 2003) (Holtzapple et al, 1984;Brown and Holtzapple et al, 1990) • Resistances offered by the crystallinity and composition variation with respect to the degree of hydrolysis were neglected, as these studies were carried out on noncrystalline cellulose.…”
Section: Independent Inhibition Studies With Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…shrinking site hydrolysis model with Langmuir-type adsorption isotherm (Humphrey, 1979;Movagharnejad et al, 2003) (Holtzapple et al, 1984;Brown and Holtzapple et al, 1990) • Resistances offered by the crystallinity and composition variation with respect to the degree of hydrolysis were neglected, as these studies were carried out on noncrystalline cellulose.…”
Section: Independent Inhibition Studies With Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar breakthrough for surface-active enzymes is missing. There is no canonical kinetic description although specific models [3][4][5][6][7][8] and conceptual treatments [9][10][11] have been put forward. It is only consequent that even recent authoritative treatments on enzyme kinetics [12] shy away from discussing interfacial catalysis or do so only with a focus on special systems like membrane surfaces [13,Section 7.12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process has received rapidly increasing research interest, as it is important both in natural carbon cycling (and hence the balance between soil organic matter and atmospheric carbon) and in emerging industries that produce sustainable fuels and materials from lignocellulosic feedstocks . Many reports have used a conventional or slightly adapted Michaelis–Menten (MM) approach to analyze initial rates for cellulases acting on insoluble cellulose, but a number of concerns regarding this practice have been raised. ,, The main caveat, which was emphasized already in the aforementioned review by McLaren and Packer, is whether the substrate is in excess with respect to the enzyme under typical experimental conditions. This is a fundamental requirement for the QSSA, but its validity is difficult to assess in heterogeneous systems, where a molar concentration of substrate cannot be defined unambiguously.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%