2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2008.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the measured responses of a tissue-equivalent proportional counter to high energy heavy (HZE) particles and those simulated using the Geant4 Monte Carlo code

Abstract: Monte Carlo simulations of heavy ion interactions using the Geant4 toolkit were compared with measurements of energy deposition in a spherical tissue-equivalent proportional counter (TEPC). A spherical cavity with a physical diameter of 12.7 mm was filled with propane-based tissue-equivalent gas surrounded by a wall of A-150 tissue-equivalent plastic that was 2.54 mm to thick. Measurements and Monte Carlo simulations were used to record the energy deposition and the trajectory of the incident particle on an ev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In table 5 the results for the TEPC placed at "0 cm, plateau" at the depth of 52.1 mm in water under the impact of 3 mm FWHM beam at the entrance of the phantom are presented, cases (1a), (1b), ( 1c) and (1d). At this TEPC position the energy of 12 C at the entrance to the TEPC volume is estimated as ∼ 218A MeV, and it is close to the beam energy (220A MeV) used by Taddei et al for homogeneous irradiation of a similar TEPC, but surrounded by air (Taddei et al 2008). The thickness of the TEPC wall was twice as large (2.54 mm) compared to the TEPC used at GSI, and their TEPC operated at different tissue-equivalent gas pressure (effective diameter of 3 µm).…”
Section: Lineal Energy Spectra Inside the Water Phantomsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In table 5 the results for the TEPC placed at "0 cm, plateau" at the depth of 52.1 mm in water under the impact of 3 mm FWHM beam at the entrance of the phantom are presented, cases (1a), (1b), ( 1c) and (1d). At this TEPC position the energy of 12 C at the entrance to the TEPC volume is estimated as ∼ 218A MeV, and it is close to the beam energy (220A MeV) used by Taddei et al for homogeneous irradiation of a similar TEPC, but surrounded by air (Taddei et al 2008). The thickness of the TEPC wall was twice as large (2.54 mm) compared to the TEPC used at GSI, and their TEPC operated at different tissue-equivalent gas pressure (effective diameter of 3 µm).…”
Section: Lineal Energy Spectra Inside the Water Phantomsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Calculations with various physics settings are marked by letters: (a) -default MCHIT physics, (b) -the Penelope model for electrons, (c)without simulation of δ-electrons, (d) -without simulation of nuclear fragmentation. Experimental data (Martino et al 2010), ( 1) and (Taddei et al 2008) also explains the value of ȳf calculated for the conditions of the second experiment, but with central incidence of 12 C nuclei on TEPC, case (2a). There the beam fragmentation outside the TEPC is negligible as it is surrounded by air.…”
Section: Lineal Energy Spectra Inside the Water Phantommentioning
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This would allow for studies of the microscopic energy distribution in the target medium. Tracking of delta electrons has for example been performed with Geant4 (Taddei et al 2008) and a study comparing to this work might be of interest.…”
Section: Scoring Of the Stpr In Shield-hitmentioning
confidence: 99%