2009
DOI: 10.1097/ijg.0b013e3181752c97
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of the Intervisit Intraocular Pressure Fluctuation After 180 and 360 Degrees of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT) as a Primary Therapy in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension

Abstract: This study suggests that 360-degree SLT is more efficacious in achieving smaller IOP fluctuations than treatment with 180-degree SLT.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
44
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…According to this study, it seems that 180°treat-ment might be inadequate or that the treatment parameters that were used suboptimal. Prasad et al (2009) described increased efficacy with 360°c ompared with 180°procedure in patients treated with SLT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this study, it seems that 180°treat-ment might be inadequate or that the treatment parameters that were used suboptimal. Prasad et al (2009) described increased efficacy with 360°c ompared with 180°procedure in patients treated with SLT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Le traitement de 360 • de l'angle iridocornéen donne les meilleurs résultats [10,11]. Par ailleurs, le taux de succès dépend de la définition de « succès », plus ou moins sévère selon les études.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Other studies have suggested that 360-degree treatment is more effective than 180 degrees with IOP reductions reportedly as high as 9.08 mm Hg (35% reduction from baseline) 2 years after 360-degree SLT. 26 Baseline IOP also seems to affect the overall reduction in IOP and may serve as a predictor for response to 360-degree SLT. In a study by Shibata et al, 27 pretreatment IOPZ21 mm Hg resulted in a more dramatic decrease in IOP compared with a baseline IOP<21 mm Hg (33.5% ± 17.4% vs. 22.4% ± 17.9%; P<0.05, respectively) in Japanese patients treated with 360-degree SLT.…”
Section: Laser Trabeculoplastymentioning
confidence: 98%