1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.195-az0331.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the infusion pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cisatracurium, the 1R‐cis 1′R‐cis isomer of atracurium, with atracurium besylate in healthy patients

Abstract: SummaryWe have compared the pharmacokinetics of cisatracurium with atracurium when given by bolus dose followed by continuous infusion. Twenty healthy patients were anaesthetised with thiopentone, midazolam, fentanyl and 70% nitrous oxide in oxygen. Ten patients (Group C) were randomly allocated to receive cisatracurium 0.1 mg.kg ¹1 and 10 patients (Group A) were given atracurium 0.5 mg.kg ¹1. Neuromuscular block was monitored using a mechanomyograph. When the first twitch of the train-of-four had recovered to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, when the reversal was attempted at 10% T1 recovery from cisatracurium block, 4.2 times as much edrophonium as neostigmine was required to achieve 50% T1, but 6.6 times as much is needed to reach a TOF ratio of 0.5 (Tables II, III). In this respect, our results are consistent with our previously published results and those of other investigators [17][18][19][20][21][22][23] who reported similar observations with other non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockers. The reported neostigmine:edrophonium potency ratio for train-of-four, 10 min after injection of the antagonist (following return to 10% first twitch height) was 10.4 for mivacurium, 20 13.5 for atracurium, 22 26 for vecuronium, 18 27.5 for rocuronium, 19 24 for pancuronium and 29 for tubocurarine.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, when the reversal was attempted at 10% T1 recovery from cisatracurium block, 4.2 times as much edrophonium as neostigmine was required to achieve 50% T1, but 6.6 times as much is needed to reach a TOF ratio of 0.5 (Tables II, III). In this respect, our results are consistent with our previously published results and those of other investigators [17][18][19][20][21][22][23] who reported similar observations with other non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockers. The reported neostigmine:edrophonium potency ratio for train-of-four, 10 min after injection of the antagonist (following return to 10% first twitch height) was 10.4 for mivacurium, 20 13.5 for atracurium, 22 26 for vecuronium, 18 27.5 for rocuronium, 19 24 for pancuronium and 29 for tubocurarine.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In this study, spontaneous recovery for the first 10 min following return to 10% first twitch height, T1 and TOF proceeded at similar rates with atracurium and cisatracurium ( Figures 1-4 and Table I). Similarly, Smith and colleagues 17 reported that recovery times after a bolus dose of atracurium 0.5 mg·kg -1 or cisatracurium 0.1 mg·kg -1 were similar. We also noted that at five minutes edrophonium was more effective in reversing twitch depression induced by cisatracurium than atracurium (Table II).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The intravenous dosage of cisatracurium in infants and children is no more than 0.2 mg/kg (4 × ED 95 ) [4][5][6][7]. On the basis of previous findings, we determined the maximal dosage of cisatracurium to be 4 times ED 95 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the mid-1990s, a number of preclinical and human studies established the efficacy and safety of cisatracurium. [4346] The example of cisatracurium demonstrates that isolation of one of the stereoisomer may result in improvement over a parent racemic compound, which can translate into clinical practice.…”
Section: Basic Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%