2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the influence of material on in vitro cartilage tissue engineering with PCL, PGS, and POC 3D scaffold architecture seeded with chondrocytes

Abstract: The goal of this study was to determine material effects on cartilage regeneration for scaffolds with the same controlled architecture. The 3D polycaprolactone (PCL), poly (glycerol sebacate) (PGS), and poly (1,8 octanediol-co-citrate) (POC) scaffolds of the same design were physically characterized and tissue regeneration in terms of cell phenotype, cellular proliferation and differentiation, and matrix production were compared to find which material would be most optimal for cartilage regeneration in vitro. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
109
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, after 4 weeks of culture, POC provided the best support for cartilage regeneration: It yielded the highest tissue ingrowth (cell penetration), matrix production, relative mRNA expressions for chondrocyte differentiation (Col2/Col1), and DNA and glycosaminoglycan content. The results (113) demonstrate that POC can outperform other biodegradable elastomers used for cartilage tissue engineering and warrants further in vivo studies. Motivated by their previous studies, these researchers published successive reports to evaluate the coupled effects of 3D POC scaffold pore shape and permeability on chondrogenesis using primary chondrocytes in vivo (114, 115).…”
Section: Applications In Regenerative Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, after 4 weeks of culture, POC provided the best support for cartilage regeneration: It yielded the highest tissue ingrowth (cell penetration), matrix production, relative mRNA expressions for chondrocyte differentiation (Col2/Col1), and DNA and glycosaminoglycan content. The results (113) demonstrate that POC can outperform other biodegradable elastomers used for cartilage tissue engineering and warrants further in vivo studies. Motivated by their previous studies, these researchers published successive reports to evaluate the coupled effects of 3D POC scaffold pore shape and permeability on chondrogenesis using primary chondrocytes in vivo (114, 115).…”
Section: Applications In Regenerative Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…3D scaffolds of the same microarchitectural design were fabricated using PCL, PGS, or POC (113). These studies show that PGS is the least favorable material for cartilage regeneration, as determined by high dedifferentiation (Col1), hypertrophic mRNA expression (Col10), and high matrix degradation (MMP13, MMP3).…”
Section: Applications In Regenerative Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although permeability was measured, it was not specifically controlled through scaffold design. Lastly, we have previously shown 39 that PCL scaffolds do not support cartilage regeneration or POC scaffolds for the same architecture. In our study, we designed scaffolds such that pore size, surface area, and degrees of interconnectivity were rigorously controlled within narrow ranges.…”
Section: Jeong and Hollistermentioning
confidence: 96%
“…PGS has been examined as a membrane material for cell delivery to damaged tissues, including the heart [4] and retina [5], and as a material for nerve guidance conduits for peripheral nerve repair [6]. Porous PGS scaffolds have been used to support the growth of cardiac tissue [7,8], blood vessels [9,10], and cartilage [11][12][13]. Additionally, PGS has also been used as a degradable drug carrier for antibiotics and anticancer drugs [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%