A Comparison of the Impacts of Wind Energy and Unconventional Gas Development on Land-use and Ecosystem Services: An Example from the Anadarko Basin of Oklahoma, USA

Abstract

The United States energy industry is transforming with the rapid development of alternative energy sources and technological advancements in fossil fuels. Two major changes include the growth of wind turbines and unconventional oil and gas. We measured land-use impacts and associated ecosystem services costs of unconventional gas and wind energy development within the Anadarko Basin of the Oklahoma Woodford Shale, an area that has experienced large increases in both energy sectors. Unconventional gas wells developed three times as much land compared to wind turbines (on a per unit basis), resulting in higher ecosystem services costs for gas. Gas wells had higher impacts on intensive agricultural lands (i.e., row crops) compared to wind turbines that had higher impacts on natural grasslands/pastures. Because wind turbines produced on average less energy compared to gas wells, the average land-use-related ecosystem cost per gigajoule of energy produced was almost the same. Our results demonstrate that both unconventional gas and wind energy have substantial impacts on land use, which likely affect wildlife populations and land-use-related ecosystem services. Although wind energy does not have the associated greenhouse gas emissions, we suggest that the direct impacts on ecosystems in terms of land use are similar to unconventional fossil fuels. Considering the expected rapid global expansion of these two forms of energy production, many ecosystems are likely to be at risk.

Quantifying the ecosystem services values of electricity generation in the US Chihuahuan Desert: A life cycle perspective

“…Deserts probably have low ecosystem services values relative to other biomes and, in the case of this region, the energy resource level and production efficiency of the region is high for gas, wind, and solar, giving a relatively low ecosystem services impact per unit of energy production. Other regions of the United States that have higher ecosystem services values accompanied by high energy production land impacts (e.g., Great Plains (Davis et al, 2018;Howden et al, 2019)) would presumably have proportionally higher ecosystem services losses relative to energy production.…”

The “Green on Green” Conflict in Wind Energy Development: A Case Study of Environmentally Conscious Individuals in Oklahoma, USA

“…This research focuses on the state of Oklahoma, where turbine development has increased in recent decades. There currently exists literature based in Oklahoma on socioeconomic impacts of wind energy development [18], impacts of wind development on public schools [19], the relationship of wind power and real estate prices [20], as well as a comparison of the impacts of wind energy and unconventional gas on land use and ecosystem services [21]. At the time of this writing, however, virtually no representation of public opinion related to issues surrounding wind turbines in the state is seen in the literature.…”

Effects of pipeline and well‐pad reclamation on topsoil properties: A meta‐analysis

“…The ROW can then be returned to its pre‐disturbance land use by being seeded to native plants in a grassland setting or being returned to agricultural production in an agroecosystem. Grasslands and croplands have been disproportionately affected by infrastructure development and reclamation (Baynard et al., 2017; Davis et al., 2018; Preston & Kim, 2016). Although the duration that pipeline ROWs are disturbed can be days, weeks, or months, well pads are reclaimed after the production of the well has sufficiently decreased, which may be decades after the installation of the well.…”