2010
DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.200900123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the in vitro biotransformation of (–)‐epicatechin and procyanidin B2 by human faecal microbiota

Abstract: The catabolism by human faecal microbiota of (-)-epicatechin (1) (2, 3-cis stereochemistry) and its dimer pure procyanidin B2 (2), has been compared using a static in vitro culture model. The catabolites were characterised by LC-MS(n), UV absorption and relative retention time, and quantified relative to standards. No more than approximately 10% of procyanidin B2 (2) was converted to epicatechin (1) by scission of the interflavan bond. Five phenolic acid catabolites (M(r)<290) were unique to 2, and ten phenoli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
138
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
25
138
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the 8-fold larger V d calculated from the total 14 C after oral dosing (higher or lower), compared with the intravenous dosing, indicates that some of the compounds formed after the oral dosing are comparatively more hydrophobic than the parent compound. This observation is consistent with previous findings (Stoupi et al, 2009) that the gut flora metabolites produced in an in vitro model of procyanidin B2 catabolism have greater retention times (14.06 -22.71 min) compared with the substrate (13.53 min) during reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the 8-fold larger V d calculated from the total 14 C after oral dosing (higher or lower), compared with the intravenous dosing, indicates that some of the compounds formed after the oral dosing are comparatively more hydrophobic than the parent compound. This observation is consistent with previous findings (Stoupi et al, 2009) that the gut flora metabolites produced in an in vitro model of procyanidin B2 catabolism have greater retention times (14.06 -22.71 min) compared with the substrate (13.53 min) during reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In this regard, it is interesting to note that after a single oral dose of (Ϫ)-[3-3 H]epicatechin (4.5 mg/kg), rats excreted 2.9 and 90.3% of the total radioactivity in urine and feces, respectively, and the bioavailability was 7.8% calculated from the U ϱ values (Catterall et al, 2003). This behavior is in marked contrast to that observed with [ 14 C]procyanidin B2 and also suggests that in the present study little if any of the procyanidin was metabolized to an intermediate monomer, consistent with previous reports (Stoupi et al, 2009). In the present study, C max increased in proportion with the oral dose, the value for group II being twice that of group III (Table 2), thus providing no evidence for saturation at least at these two doses and suggesting linear first-order elimination at such doses.…”
Section: In Vitrosupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…by live microbiota are not observed with microbiota inactivated by chloroform suggesting that enzymes released from dead cells were not responsible [130,131], and implying that uptake mechanisms for the test substance were available to at least some of the organisms present. Escherichia coli and Bifidobacterium bifidum can, under anaerobic conditions, take up quercetin much more efficiently than either rutin or quercetin-3-O-glucoside, and B.…”
Section: Controls Used In Model Fermentations Have Clearly Demonstratmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compounds 4-6 were reported to be metabolites of catechins and proanthocyanidins produced by mammalian intestinal bacteria [6,7,11,12]. Pyrogallol (3) is considered to be produced by degradation of gallic acid [9,10], while the three diphenylpropane derivatives are reduction products of 2, 3, and (−)-epiafzelechin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%