2001
DOI: 10.1109/50.971674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the homodyne crosstalk characteristics of optical add-drop multiplexers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inserting (10) into (5) and (6) we get after some algebra (13) (14) with (15) (16) and (17) where is given by (15) with replaced by and replaced by , whereas is given by (16) with replaced by . In (17), the random coefficients are mutually independent zero-mean Gaussian random variables, with variances , for , since according with (17) and (12) we have (18) where is the Dirac delta function and the operator denotes the expected value. An additional simplification can be obtained in (15) and (16) by assuming that is constant over the interval giving…”
Section: Decision Variable Modeling Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Inserting (10) into (5) and (6) we get after some algebra (13) (14) with (15) (16) and (17) where is given by (15) with replaced by and replaced by , whereas is given by (16) with replaced by . In (17), the random coefficients are mutually independent zero-mean Gaussian random variables, with variances , for , since according with (17) and (12) we have (18) where is the Dirac delta function and the operator denotes the expected value. An additional simplification can be obtained in (15) and (16) by assuming that is constant over the interval giving…”
Section: Decision Variable Modeling Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improved tolerance of DPSK towards crosstalk is particularly advantageous in optical networking environments, because due to imperfections of optical devices used to build network elements, such as OADMs, optical cross-connects, optical burst switches, as well as from spurious reflections inside the network, there are many leakage signals that interfere with the desired signal originating crosstalk [18]- [20]. It is well known that this phenomenon can be particularly damaging when the interference and the signal have the same nominal wavelength, leading to the so-called in-band or homodyne crosstalk, since in this case the signal-crosstalk beatings originated at the receiver can not be filtered out, becoming, as a consequence, an important source of signal quality degradation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The used OADM configuration is based on 180°optical hybrids and FBG (details see in [23]). The crosstalk level to the leakage path between DROP and ADD port is 60 dB.…”
Section: Short Overview Of the Derived Power Consumption Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Homodyne crosstalk can be incoherent or coherent [7]. Coherent homodyne crosstalk causes a fading effect on the signal, which does not normally cause degradation of the TON performance [8]. However, coherent homodyne crosstalk combined with incoherent homodyne crosstalk leads to the fluctuation of the power penalty due to incoherent homodyne crosstalk over time [7][8][9].…”
Section: R G Leiria and A V T Cartaxomentioning
confidence: 99%