1991
DOI: 10.1002/art.1790040406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the full and short versions of the arthritis impact measurement scales

Abstract: ?'his study examined the validity and reliability of full and short versions of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (AIMS). One hundred fifty-five patlents with Rheumatoid Arthritis followed at a Universi ty Hospital Rheumatology Clinic completed the full AIMS at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, and 18 months. After reducing the 45-item AIMS to 22, alpha reliabilities and test-retest correlations showed that, with the exception of test-retest correlations for mobility at 6 months and for pain at 12 und 18 mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it replicates the natural process of development of a new instrument with a predetermined framework, represented by the targeted content of the original instrument. Previously, there have been 2 reports of studies attempting to reduce the original AIMS questionnaire (45 items in 9 dimensions) (18,19). Both used an approach based on statistical item analysis methodology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it replicates the natural process of development of a new instrument with a predetermined framework, represented by the targeted content of the original instrument. Previously, there have been 2 reports of studies attempting to reduce the original AIMS questionnaire (45 items in 9 dimensions) (18,19). Both used an approach based on statistical item analysis methodology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the selection process, we assigned a hierarchi- (18,19). Both used an approach based on statistical item analysis methodology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The domain “pain” is predominant also in assessing HRQoL in patients with RA. It strongly influences the scores of disease-specific scales, such as the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (AIMS) and AIMS2 [ 112 , 113 ], and well-known generic scales, such as the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) and Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) [ 114 , 115 ]. Table 1 summarizes the available scales to measure pain in patients with RA.…”
Section: How To Measure Chronic Pain?mentioning
confidence: 99%