2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10915-019-01007-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of the Explicit and Implicit Hybridizable Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Nonlinear Shallow Water Equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For transient flows, the HDG method has been combined with a variety of low and high-order time integrators [52, 71-73, 77, 94]. Although less explored, there are also works where the HDG method has been employed with explicit time-marching algorithms [114,115].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For transient flows, the HDG method has been combined with a variety of low and high-order time integrators [52, 71-73, 77, 94]. Although less explored, there are also works where the HDG method has been employed with explicit time-marching algorithms [114,115].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar idea is presented in [169] to devise an implicit-explicit (IMEX) HDG-DG scheme in which the linear part of the problem is solved using a hybridised DG method and a singly diagonally implicit Runge-Kutta (SDIRK) scheme and the nonlinear one is approximated by means of an explicit Runge-Kutta (RK) DG discretisation. A detailed comparison of explicit and implicit approaches to the nonlinear shallow water equations is provided in [229].…”
Section: Shallow Water Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where F h = F (q h ) and S h = S(q h ), F * h is a single valued approximation to F h n over element faces, called the numerical flux, and n is the unit outward normal vector to element face. The present work uses the numerical flux from the hybridized discontinuous Galerkin method developed by Samii et al in [36]. Therefore, the numerical flux is defined through q h ∈ M p,d+1 h , an approximation to q over the mesh skeleton called the numerical trace, as in [36]…”
Section: Decoupled Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%