2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1079-2104(00)70130-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the effects of two burs on endodontic access in all-ceramic high Lucite crowns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors concluded carbide burs produced more fractures and craze lines than diamond rotary cutting instruments. In another study, Haselton et al 8 quantitatively characterized damage to crowns following endodontic access. Using SEM analysis on 28 Lucite-reinforced pressed glass-ceramic crowns (IPS Empress; Ivoclar Vivadent, Amherst, NY), the authors classified the damage into 3 categories: (1) edge chipping-a disruption of the outline form; (2) visual microcrack-a crack with no separation of porcelain, and (3) fracture-a crack resulting in 2 or more parts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors concluded carbide burs produced more fractures and craze lines than diamond rotary cutting instruments. In another study, Haselton et al 8 quantitatively characterized damage to crowns following endodontic access. Using SEM analysis on 28 Lucite-reinforced pressed glass-ceramic crowns (IPS Empress; Ivoclar Vivadent, Amherst, NY), the authors classified the damage into 3 categories: (1) edge chipping-a disruption of the outline form; (2) visual microcrack-a crack with no separation of porcelain, and (3) fracture-a crack resulting in 2 or more parts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(26,27) Endodontic access openings through all ceramic restorations may initiate microcracks which could propagate with time and cause fracture. Considering these challenges, access openings were done with a diamond rotary cutting instrument in a high speed hand piece with heavy water spray in accordance with Sutherland et al (28) Haselton et al (29) and Oden et al (30) in order to avoid the vibration of low speed hand pieces which may produce cracks at the ceramic margins. Diamonds were the instrument of choice rather than carbide burs because they are more suited for ceramics as the mechanism of grinding leads to a smoother cut with less vibration.…”
Section: Different Letters In the Same Column Indicating Statisticallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ceramic systems respond differently to the creation of access openings, with all‐ceramic crowns being negatively affected when accessed. Edge chipping commonly seen around the access opening can render a restoration more prone to crack propagation …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Edge chipping commonly seen around the access opening can render a restoration more prone to crack propagation. [17][18][19][20][21] The strength of lithium disilicate in particular poses distinct challenges during endodontic access. Specialized diamonds with anti-clog coatings, minimal heat generation designs, and durable brazing techniques, in combination with copious water irrigation, aim to minimize ceramic chipping and heat accumulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation