1988
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1988.tb16558.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the effects of the calcium entry blockers, verapamil, diltiazem and flunarizine against contractions of the rat isolated aorta and portal vein

Abstract: The actions of the chemically distinct calcium entry blockers, verapamil (Ver), diltiazem (Dlz) and flunarizine (Flu) have been compared in rat isolated aorta and portal vein. KCl‐induced contractions of the rat aorta depend exclusively upon extracellular Ca2+, whereas, those induced by noradrenaline (NA) rely upon Ca2+ from intra‐ and extracellular sources. The NA‐induced contraction was pharmacologically dissected under Ca2+‐free conditions revealing a contraction dependent upon intracellular Ca2+ (EGTA‐resi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
15
1
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
15
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This resulted either in a time-dependent effect on 100 mm KCl-induced contraction or in an increase of the inhibition of short contractions after preincubation of the tissue with the antagonist in depolarizing solution. In agreement with our previous observations (Morel & Godfraind, 1987 In many tissues, calcium entry blockers have been reported to be less potent inhibitors of the contraction induced by agonist stimulation than by depolarization (Cauvin et al, 1983;Marriott, 1988;Godfraind et al, 1986). This observation led to the hypothesis of the existence of two different types of calcium channels, one controlled by the occupation of specific receptors and the other controlled by membrane potential (Cauvin & van Breemen, 1985).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This resulted either in a time-dependent effect on 100 mm KCl-induced contraction or in an increase of the inhibition of short contractions after preincubation of the tissue with the antagonist in depolarizing solution. In agreement with our previous observations (Morel & Godfraind, 1987 In many tissues, calcium entry blockers have been reported to be less potent inhibitors of the contraction induced by agonist stimulation than by depolarization (Cauvin et al, 1983;Marriott, 1988;Godfraind et al, 1986). This observation led to the hypothesis of the existence of two different types of calcium channels, one controlled by the occupation of specific receptors and the other controlled by membrane potential (Cauvin & van Breemen, 1985).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Clearly, those vascular contractions which are mediated by release of intracellular Ca2+ should be insensitive to calcium entry blockade, unless release processes are triggered by influx of extracellular Ca2 + Previous studies have demonstrated that EGTA-resistant responses of the rat aorta are indeed resistant to verapamil, supporting the suggestion that these responses are mediated by intracellular Ca2+ (Heaslip & Rahwan, 1983;Marriott, 1988). Nevertheless, it is not certain that the relative contribution of Ca2+ from an intracellular source ultimately determines the verapamil sensitivity of sustained NA-induced contractions elicited in the presence of Ca2", since in the rat aorta, intracellular Ca2" is only transiently involved during the early part of NA-induced contractions (Yamashita et al, 1977).…”
Section: Mechanisms Ofpo2-dependent Modifications In Verapamil Sensitmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Vascular contractility has also been shown to be reduced by verapamil through mechanisms independent of calcium entry blockade (Raddino et al, 1987), but these actions are associated with the use of higher concentrations (> 10 gM) than those utilised in the present study (Triggle, 1982). However, in the rat aorta the effects of selective blockade of Ca2+ entry processes by verapamil need not be identical to those of extracellular Ca2+ withdrawal, since different pathways for activated Ca2+ entry do not appear to be equally sensitive to verapamil (Marriott, 1988).…”
Section: Mechanisms Ofpo2-dependent Modifications In Verapamil Sensitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contractions induced by high concentrations of noradrenaline are also biphasic: the early fast component of contraction depends upon release of intracellular Ca2", while the slowly developing sustained phase of contraction depends upon influx of extracellular Ca2+ (Marriott, 1988). Accordingly, under Ca2'-free conditions, a smaller contraction may be induced in the rat aorta by noradrenaline and this must be mediated by intracellular Ca2'-release from internal stores (Noguera & D'Ocon, 1992, 1993.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%