2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-014-8206-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the effect of hot stretching on microstructures and properties of polyacrylonitrile and rayon-based carbon fibers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Temperatures of 1400 °C and above result in graphitic fibres with less content of nitrogen or hydrogen . Because the highly graphitic carbon fibres is formed by the temperature increase, crystallite thickness size and orientation increases and the interlayer spacing between the single graphene planes are reduced . The enhanced crystal growth is different for the single crystallite dimensions.…”
Section: Process‐structure‐relations and Their Technical Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Temperatures of 1400 °C and above result in graphitic fibres with less content of nitrogen or hydrogen . Because the highly graphitic carbon fibres is formed by the temperature increase, crystallite thickness size and orientation increases and the interlayer spacing between the single graphene planes are reduced . The enhanced crystal growth is different for the single crystallite dimensions.…”
Section: Process‐structure‐relations and Their Technical Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crystal growth of the longitudinal crystal size and the overall crystal orientation can further be pronounced by applied stresses or dwell time . In contrast, the crystal thickness has an optimum for crystal growth vs. applied stretching and is less sensitive to crystal growth vs. time .…”
Section: Process‐structure‐relations and Their Technical Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same way, the parameter p can be deduced through a known e 1 . The relationship between in‐plane modulus and orientation degree was researched for PAN‐GF and R‐GF in our previous study, where the GFs with different orientation degrees were obtained by graphitization under different stretching tensions at a certain heat treatment temperature 15 . Then the in‐plane modulus e 1 and shear modulus g values were calculated using the uniform stress model, which are listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…< cos 2 φ > can be calculated from the X‐ray profile in Azimuth scanning, while the e 1 and g need to be regressed according to the equation, which need a series of carbon fiber samples with different preferred orientation degrees, however, with the same e 1 and g values. This is actually impossible; therefore, the literatures before either took the carbon fibers from a same raw material or a little more reasonably took a series of carbon fibers with different orientation degrees by hot stretching at the same heat treatment temperature assumed that they have the same e 1 and g values 14–16 . Hence a method needs to be developed to measure the e 1 value for a single sample individually.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-temperature treatment (HTT) and simultaneous moderate stretching can increase the carbon-fiber tensile strength and tensile modulus through a preferred orientation of carbon crystallites. 9,10 Research 5,[9][10][11][12] has shown that carbon fibers can stretch during high-temperature graphitization. The specific mechanism that underpins this relationship remains unclear but it must be related to a series of complex changes that occur during HTT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%