1997
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.242.181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of the Damage Tolerance of 7010 T7451 and 7050 T7451

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In view of the high Cu content of this alloy, these two effects are thought to be due to the formation and subsequent dissolution of S phase. Effect VIII is due to the melting of S phase [4] and the presence of this phase has been confirmed in SEM/EDX experiments on alloy D (The second type of intermetallic found was Al 7 Cu 2 Fe. Melting of this phase is not observed in DSC experiments because the reaction is obscured by melting of the Al matrix phase).…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In view of the high Cu content of this alloy, these two effects are thought to be due to the formation and subsequent dissolution of S phase. Effect VIII is due to the melting of S phase [4] and the presence of this phase has been confirmed in SEM/EDX experiments on alloy D (The second type of intermetallic found was Al 7 Cu 2 Fe. Melting of this phase is not observed in DSC experiments because the reaction is obscured by melting of the Al matrix phase).…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…[18,22] There is no evidence of any effect of aging on this peak, as it does not seem to vary systematically with the heat treatment. This indicates that this peak is sample dependent, involving S phase formed during ingot casting.…”
Section: Temmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The form of the crack The S-phase intermetallics are expected to promote failure path, illustrated in Figure 10, suggests that a degree of void through coarse voiding. [22,27] S phase can be-suppressed by growth occurs at the grain boundaries rather than a separation a combination of high solution-treatment temperature and a of the boundaries. It may be suggested that the presence of limited Cu and Mg content such that all S phase can be a low density of grain boundary precipitates will be the dissolved at the solution treatment temperature.…”
Section: F Fractographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alloying elements can remain undissolved because they are incorporated in phases that are stable at solution treatment temperatures. In 7xxx alloys this concerns mainly the S (Al 2 CuMg), T (Mg 3 Zn 3 Al 2 with some Cu dissolved in it), Al 7 Cu 2 Fe and Mg 2 Si phases [27,31,32], where the presence of the latter two is caused by impurities Fe and Si. The amounts of each phase present can be calculated/predicted using thermodynamic models [33,34] or phase diagrams [35].…”
Section: Undissolved Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%