2018
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.100b5.bjj-2017-1329.r2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the cost-effectiveness of intramedullary nail fixation and locking plate fixation in the treatment of adult patients with an extra-articular fracture of the distal tibia

Abstract: This trial-based economic evaluation suggests that nail fixation is a cost-effective alternative to locking plate fixation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:624-33.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The boundaries for our designs reflected the wish to stop for futility if there were a lack of emerging evidence to support better outcomes for the comparator test treatments (locking-plate fixation and NPWT respectively). Locking-plate fixation and NPWT both proved unlikely to be cost-effective compared to intramedullary nail fixation and a standard dressing respectively in reported health economic analyses [ 46 , 47 ]. In contrast to WOLLF and FIXDT, the DRAFFT trial provided treatment effects throughout the study that tended to marginally favour the test (locking-plate) treatment over the control (wire fixation) treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The boundaries for our designs reflected the wish to stop for futility if there were a lack of emerging evidence to support better outcomes for the comparator test treatments (locking-plate fixation and NPWT respectively). Locking-plate fixation and NPWT both proved unlikely to be cost-effective compared to intramedullary nail fixation and a standard dressing respectively in reported health economic analyses [ 46 , 47 ]. In contrast to WOLLF and FIXDT, the DRAFFT trial provided treatment effects throughout the study that tended to marginally favour the test (locking-plate) treatment over the control (wire fixation) treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the limitations of this preliminary analysis is that this study does not provide a costutility analysis, considering the quality of life-adjusted life years (QALYs), which is regarded as an economically important aspect [9,26,27]. The present study can only be used to compare the insertion of pre-surgical ST in the Brazilian scenario with the usual protocol in the health system.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intramedullary nailing of distal tibial fractures has several proposed benefits compared to ORIF including cost efficacy, [19,20] shorter operating and radiation time, [13,21] and decreased soft tissue disruption leading to more favorable local biology for fracture union and wound-related complications. [6,[12][13][14]21,22] One of the primary benefits of long bone fracture treatment with IMN is the facilitation of immediate weight bearing due to the biomechanical load sharing nature of intramedullary devices.…”
Section: Management With Intramedullary Nailingmentioning
confidence: 99%