2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the accuracy of Willems’ and Cameriere’s methods based on panoramic radiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
14
0
9

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
14
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…El-Bakery et al [6] and Fernandes et al [13] reported that the Cameriere et al [8] technique is accurate for the estimation of age in the Egyptian and Brazilian population groups, respectively, despite both studies reporting either an over and/or underestimation of age (Table 1). In accordance with literary reports the Cameriere et al [8] method was recorded to underestimate age in the Malaysian population [18], Indian population [19], Turkish population [20], Turkish population [21] and Chinese population [7] (Table 1). Furthermore, Ozveren et al [21] stated that the Cameriere et al [8] method more significantly underestimated the dental age in females when compared to their male counterparts (Table 1).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…El-Bakery et al [6] and Fernandes et al [13] reported that the Cameriere et al [8] technique is accurate for the estimation of age in the Egyptian and Brazilian population groups, respectively, despite both studies reporting either an over and/or underestimation of age (Table 1). In accordance with literary reports the Cameriere et al [8] method was recorded to underestimate age in the Malaysian population [18], Indian population [19], Turkish population [20], Turkish population [21] and Chinese population [7] (Table 1). Furthermore, Ozveren et al [21] stated that the Cameriere et al [8] method more significantly underestimated the dental age in females when compared to their male counterparts (Table 1).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…As this method only requires open apices and teeth length to be measured, it is easier, and more objective compared to other quantitative methods. Some previous study showed that Cameriere's method is more accurate than the widely used Demirjian's or Willems's methods [34][35][36][37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on research on the distinguishable features of skull bones, symphysis pubis, long bones, hand bones and permanent dentition 2 , 6 10 , the Study Group on Forensic Age Diagnostics of the German Society of Legal Medicine (AGFAD) presented the criteria for age estimation in lawsuits. Dental examination is highly reliable because dental development is less influenced by both internal and external factors 1 , 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%